Documentation

TauCeti.Algebra.Homology.EulerCharacteristic.ExtEuler.Graded.ForgetGrading

The q-Euler form at q = 1 against the ungraded Ext-Euler characteristic #

Let C be a k-linear abelian category with a grading-shift autoequivalence e, and let D be a k-linear abelian category thought of as C with its grading forgotten along a functor U. Setting q = 1 collapses the internal degrees of

χ_q(X, Y) = ∑ n, (-1)ⁿ ∑ j, q⁻ʲ dim_k Ext^n(X, Y{j})

into the single alternating sum ∑ n, (-1)ⁿ ∑ j, dim_k Ext^n(X, Y{j}). That is the ordinary Ext-Euler characteristic of the ungraded pair only when the ungraded Ext groups assemble the graded ones, so the identification is not a formal consequence of having a shift: it needs the comparison isomorphisms

⨁ j, Ext^n(X, Y{j}) ≅ Ext^n(X', Y')

as an extra hypothesis, recorded here as TauCeti.IsGradedExtComparison. A pair (X', Y') of objects of D is the intended value (U X, U Y) of such a functor, but nothing below uses U itself, so the predicate is stated for two objects of D directly. Only the isomorphisms themselves are asked for: comparing the two Ext long exact sequences would need them to be compatible with the connecting maps as well, which the numerical identity below does not use.

Under that hypothesis the ungraded pair inherits both halves of Euler-admissibility from the graded one, and TauCeti.IsGradedExtComparison.laurentEval_one_gradedExtEuler identifies the specialization of the q-Euler characteristic at q = 1 with the ordinary Ext-Euler characteristic. The same identity for the packaged sesquilinear form is TauCeti.IsGradedExtComparison.gradedExtEulerSpecialized_one_mk_of_mk_of.

Main definitions #

Main results #

References #

The bigraded Ext groups of (X, Y) assemble into the ungraded Ext groups of a pair (X', Y'): in every cohomological degree the direct sum over the internal degrees of Ext^n(X, Y{j}) is Ext^n(X', Y').

This is the hypothesis under which a q-Euler form specializes at q = 1 to an ordinary Ext-Euler characteristic. A functor forgetting the grading supplies the intended pairs (U X, U Y); the existence of such a functor, or even of a shift-compatible one, does not by itself supply these isomorphisms.

Instances For
    theorem TauCeti.isGradedExtComparison_of_subsingleton_ne {C : Type u} [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Abelian C] (k : Type t) [Field k] [CategoryTheory.Linear k C] [CategoryTheory.HasExt C] (e : C ≌ C) {X Y : C} (d : ℤ) (hd : ∀ (n : ℕ) (j : ℤ), j ≠ d → Subsingleton (GradedExt e X Y n j)) :
    IsGradedExtComparison k e X Y X ((e ^ d).functor.obj Y)

    A grading concentrated in a single internal degree admits a shifted comparison pair. If the bigraded Ext groups of (X, Y) vanish in every internal degree other than d, then the surviving degree is the whole direct sum, so (X, Y{d}) is a comparison pair for (X, Y) inside the same category.

    Ext-finiteness of the ungraded pair follows from finiteness of the internal grading: a direct sum of finitely many finite-dimensional spaces is finite-dimensional.

    A uniform cohomological vanishing bound for the bigraded Ext groups bounds the ungraded ones.

    Euler-admissibility descends to the comparison pair. Both halves transfer separately: finite internal support gives Ext-finiteness and the uniform cohomological bound gives eventual vanishing.

    Every truncation of the q-Euler sum evaluates at q = 1 to the corresponding truncation of the ungraded alternating sum.

    The q-Euler characteristic at q = 1 is the ordinary Ext-Euler characteristic of the comparison pair. The comparison isomorphisms are what make this true: a grading shift alone identifies no graded sum of Ext groups with an ungraded one.

    The specialized q-Euler form #

    The q-Euler form specialized at q = 1, evaluated on two object classes, is the ordinary Ext-Euler characteristic of any comparison pair for those two objects.