Subgroups generated by a set of Kostant root subgroups #
Let U_ℤ = kostantForm e h act on a rational representation V preserving an additive subgroup
M ≤ V, with every distinguished root vector eᵢ acting nilpotently. For a set S of indices,
U_S(A) = ⟨xᵢ(t) : i ∈ S, t ∈ A⟩ ≤ Aut_A(A ⊗[ℤ] M)
is the subgroup generated by the corresponding Kostant root subgroups. Taking S to be all
indices recovers the elementary group of
TauCeti.Algebra.Lie.UniversalEnveloping.Kostant.RootSubgroup.Elementary.Basic. In the simply-laced
case, taking S to be the positive roots gives the positive-root subgroup, the class-two model of
the group that a pinning of a Chevalley--Demazure group scheme will exhibit as the unipotent
radical of a Borel subgroup; that identification is not made here.
The Chevalley commutator relations make U_S behave like the subgroup attached to a closed set of
roots. Two statements are proved. First, U_S is normalized by U_T whenever the bracket of a
root vector indexed in T with one indexed in S stays in S; this is
IsChevalleyStableUnder, which packages the class-two Chevalley hypothesis of
TauCeti.Algebra.Lie.UniversalEnveloping.Kostant.RootSubgroup.Commutator.Basic over a pair of index
sets. Second, if the indices of S carry a bounded height that every nonzero bracket strictly
raises, and each bracket root is central for both inputs, then U_S(A) is nilpotent: the
subgroups attached to the level sets {i ∈ S | n ≤ ht i} form a descending central series that
reaches the trivial subgroup.
The generic group-theoretic hypotheses of kostantSubsystemSubgroup_le_normalizer and
commutator_kostantSubsystemSubgroup_le are stated on the root-subgroup generators rather than
on Lie brackets, so that a longer commutator relation — a root string of length greater than one,
as occurs outside the simply-laced types — can be fed in the same way once available.
Main declarations #
TauCeti.UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.kostantSubsystemSubgroup: the subgroupU_S(A)generated by the Kostant root subgroups indexed byS.TauCeti.UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.IsChevalleyStableUnder: the class-two Chevalley closure condition on a pair of index sets.TauCeti.UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.kostantSubsystemSubgroup_le_normalizer_of_isChevalleyStable:U_T(A)normalizesU_S(A)whenSis stable underT.TauCeti.UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.isNilpotent_kostantSubsystemSubgroup:U_S(A)is nilpotent under a class-two, height-raising bracket hypothesis with the height bounded onS.
References #
- R. W. Carter, Simple Groups of Lie Type, §§5.2--5.3.
- J. E. Humphreys, Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory, §§26--27.
- J. C. Jantzen, Representations of Algebraic Groups, II.1.
Root subgroups attached to commuting root vectors commute, with the parameter read in the value ring.
The Chevalley commutator relation with the parameter in the value ring. If
⁅eᵢ, eⱼ⁆ = c • eₖ with eₖ central for both, then xᵢ(t) xⱼ(u) xᵢ(t)⁻¹ = xⱼ(u) xₖ(c t u).
The Chevalley commutator relation in element-commutator form, with the parameter in the
value ring: ⁅xᵢ(t), xⱼ(u)⁆ = xₖ(c t u).
The subgroup of Aut_A(A ⊗[ℤ] M) generated by the Kostant root subgroups indexed by a set S
of root indices.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The subgroup attached to S is generated by the root-subgroup elements indexed by S.
Elimination principle. A subgroup contains U_S(A) exactly when it contains every
root-subgroup element indexed by S.
A root-subgroup element with index in S lies in the subgroup attached to S.
The subgroup attached to a set of indices grows with the set.
The empty index set generates the trivial subgroup.
All indices generate the elementary group.
Every subsystem subgroup sits inside the elementary group.
Scalar extension along a morphism of value rings carries a subsystem subgroup into the subsystem subgroup attached to the same index set.
Generators normalize. U_T(A) normalizes U_S(A) as soon as every root-subgroup element
indexed in T conjugates every root-subgroup element indexed in S back into U_S(A).
The hypothesis is only needed for one of the two conjugations because the generating set is closed
under inverses: xᵢ(t)⁻¹ = xᵢ(t⁻¹).
Generators bound a commutator subgroup. If a subsystem subgroup is normalized by two others, then it contains their commutator as soon as it contains the commutators of the root-subgroup generators.
The index set S is Chevalley stable under the index set T when, for every i ∈ T and
j ∈ S, the root vectors eᵢ and eⱼ either commute or have bracket an integer multiple of a
third root vector eₖ with k ∈ S, central for both.
This is the class-two case of the Chevalley commutator formula: α + β is a root while neither
2α + β nor α + 2β is. In a simply-laced root system every pair of non-proportional roots falls
under one of the two alternatives, so a set of roots closed under addition is stable under any set
of roots that maps it into itself.
Equations
Instances For
A Chevalley-stable index set has its subsystem subgroup normalized by the larger one.
A Chevalley-stable index set contained in T is normal in the subsystem subgroup of T.
The unipotent group of a class-two graded closed set of roots is nilpotent. Suppose every
index of S has height at most N, and that whenever two root vectors indexed in S fail to
commute their bracket is an integer multiple of a third root vector, indexed in S, of strictly
larger height and central for both. Then U_S(A) is nilpotent over every value ring.
The height hypothesis is only stated for the first of the two indices; the second one comes for free by reading it at the swapped pair, whose bracket is the negative.
For a simply-laced Chevalley system and S the positive roots this is the class-two model of the
positive-root subgroup, with ht the height of a root and N the height of the highest root. The
identification of that subgroup with the unipotent radical of a Borel subgroup needs a pinning and
is not part of this statement; longer root strings in non-simply-laced systems are not covered.