The underlying set of the adic spectrum Spa (A, A⁺) #
The set-level construction beneath Wedhorn, Adic Spaces (arXiv:1910.05934v1), Definition 7.23.
For a subring A⁺ of a commutative ring A with a topology, spa A⁺ is the set of continuous
points of Spv A that are sub-unit on A⁺:
spa A⁺ = {v ∈ cont A | v(a) ≤ 1 for every a ∈ A⁺}.
This is stated for arbitrary data — the file assumes [TopologicalSpace A] and nothing
relating the topology to the ring operations, and asks nothing of the subring. It is
Wedhorn's adic spectrum Spa (A, A⁺) under the hypotheses his Definition 7.23 carries: A a
Huber ring (so in particular a topological ring, which is also what makes membership in
cont A Wedhorn's Definition 7.7) and A⁺ a ring of integral elements. Those hypotheses
enter only where theorems need them — spectrality (Wedhorn Theorem 7.35) is the first such
theorem, and it lives with the Spv (A, I) machinery it consumes, not in this file. This
mirrors how cont itself is defined below its Wedhorn hypotheses.
Following the roadmap's conventions, the plus ring is an explicit Subring A argument and the
spectrum is a Set (Spv A), so a point is a valuation up to equivalence with no chosen value
group, and the subspace topology is the one the coercion ↥(spa Aplus) carries. (Mathlib's
in-flight SpaPoint of mathlib4#42315 instead bundles a representative valuation with a chosen
value group — the representation the roadmap warns must be compared before later layers may use
it; the subspace form here needs no such comparison.)
Main definitions #
TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.spa: the adic spectrum of(A, A⁺), as aSet (Spv A).
Main results #
TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.spa_defandTauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.mem_spa_iff: the set-level and membership-level characterizations — the definition is not exposed across the module boundary, so these two are the exported interface.TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.valuation_le_one_of_mem_spa: a point ofSpa (A, A⁺)has valuation at most1onA⁺.TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.spa_antitone: the spectrum shrinks as the plus ring grows. Its inclusion intoCont Aisspa_def ▸ Set.inter_subset_left.TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.spa_integralClosure: replacing the plus ring by its integral closure leavesSpaunchanged.TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.spa_topologicalClosure: over a semitopological ring, replacing the plus ring by its topological closure leavesSpaunchanged.TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.spa_eq_empty_of_one_mem_closure_zero: if1 ∈ closure {0}in a commutative ringAwith separately continuous addition, thenSpa(A, A⁺) = ∅for any plus ringA⁺(the1 ∈ closure {0} → Spa(A, A⁺) = ∅half of Wedhorn Proposition 7.49(1)).TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.trivialSection_mem_spa_iff: the trivial valuation of a prime is a point of the adic spectrum exactly when the prime is open, for any plus ring.TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.eq_top_of_spa_eq_empty: an empty adic spectrum forces every open ideal to be the unit ideal. The converse and the full separated-quotient criterion of Wedhorn Proposition 7.49(1) require the Huber-pair hypotheses and are proved inTauCeti.AlgebraicGeometry.AdicSpace.Spa.Emptiness.
Provenance #
trivialSection_mem_spa_iff is the trivial-valuation witness of AINTLIB
(github.com/CBirkbeck/AINTLIB, Apache-2.0), branch dev/adic-spaces at commit
37bbdaeb9ad9e3bc9f0d660feadc2779e455a91c, project projects/AdicSpaces/, file
Adic spaces/AdicSpectrum.lean, section Prop752, with the valuation-spectrum vocabulary adapted
to this repository's Spv/ValuativeRel interface and the introduction direction strengthened to
an equivalence. It reached this file by being factored out of
TauCeti/AlgebraicGeometry/AdicSpace/Spa/Points.lean, which had used it inline.
References #
- T. Wedhorn, Adic Spaces, arXiv:1910.05934v1, Definition 7.23 and Proposition 7.49.
- C. Birkbeck, AINTLIB, branch
dev/adic-spaces, commit37bbdaeb,projects/AdicSpaces/Adic spaces/AdicSpectrum.lean.
The continuous points of Spv A that are sub-unit on the subring A⁺, as a
Set (Spv A) — the subspace topology is the one the coercion ↥(spa Aplus) carries.
For a Huber ring A and a ring of integral elements A⁺ this is Wedhorn's adic spectrum
Spa (A, A⁺) (Definition 7.23); the definition itself asks for neither — an arbitrary
subring of an arbitrary commutative ring with a topology — and the Wedhorn hypotheses enter
only in later theorems.
Equations
- TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.spa Aplus = TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.cont A ∩ {v : TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum A | ∀ a ∈ Aplus, a ≤ᵥ 1}
Instances For
The set-level characterization of the adic spectrum: spa is the intersection of the
continuous locus with the sub-unit locus of the plus ring. The definition is not exposed
across the module boundary, so this equation is how consumers apply set-level results to
spa — for instance spa_def ▸ Set.inter_subset_left : spa Aplus ⊆ cont A.
Membership in the adic spectrum is continuity together with the sub-unit condition on the
plus ring: v ∈ Spa (A, A⁺) iff v is continuous and v(a) ≤ 1 for every a ∈ A⁺.
At a point of Spa (A, A⁺), every element of the plus ring has valuation at most 1: the
sub-unit condition of mem_spa_iff, read through the valuation v.valuation.
Enlarging the plus ring shrinks the adic spectrum.
Replacing a subring by its integral closure does not change the sub-unit valuation locus.
Replacing a subring by its topological closure does not change the adic spectrum: every point
of Spa (A, A⁺) is already sub-unit on the closure of A⁺. This is the topological counterpart of
spa_integralClosure.
The trivial valuation of a prime p is a point of the adic spectrum exactly when p is open,
for any plus ring A⁺: the sub-unit condition holds at every element of A, since a trivial
valuation takes only the values 0 and 1 and 1 lies outside a prime.
The 1 ∈ closure {0} → Spa(A, A⁺) = ∅ half of Wedhorn Proposition 7.49(1). If
1 ∈ closure {0} in a commutative ring A with separately continuous addition, then
Spa (A, A⁺) = ∅ for any plus ring A⁺.
An empty adic spectrum forces every open ideal to be the unit ideal. A proper open ideal
would lie in a maximal ideal, which is then open too, and the trivial valuation there would be a
point of Spa (A, A⁺).
This is the content of the converse half of Wedhorn Proposition 7.49(1); nothing about
closure {0} is used, only that the ideal is open.