Documentation

TauCeti.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.Affine.Point.NonsplitReduction

Points with singular reduction at a nonsplit node of even order #

Let v be a valuation on a field F, with valuation ring O, maximal ideal 𝔪 and residue field k, and let W be an elliptic curve over F with an integral model W_O over O whose reduction is a node at the origin with no rational tangent direction: a₃, a₄, a₆ ∈ 𝔪 and the tangent quadratic T² + a₁ T − a₂ has no root in k. The points with nonsingular reduction form the subgroup E₀(F) of W(F) (WeierstrassCurve.Affine.nonsingularReduction), whose index divides 2 (WeierstrassCurve.Affine.index_nonsingularReduction_dvd_two_of_tangentQuadratic_no_roots). For a discrete valuation, on a minimal equation, this is nonsplit multiplicative reduction of type Iₙ with n = ord(Δ), and Tate's algorithm reports the local index c_v = gcd(2, n) (Silverman, Advanced Topics, IV.9, Table 4.1). When n is odd every point has nonsingular reduction (WeierstrassCurve.Affine.nonsingularReduction_eq_top_of_not_splits). This file proves the even case: when Δ is a unit times a square, O is Henselian and k is finite, some point has singular reduction, so [E(F) : E₀(F)] = 2.

The equation-level construction in Affine/Henselian.lean proceeds in three steps over O (WeierstrassCurve.exists_equation_mem_maximalIdeal_of_tangentQuadratic_no_roots).

The finiteness of k is used only to find a point on the residue conic, which over a general residue field need not exist.

Main results #

References #

At a nonsplit node with Δ a unit times a square, some point has singular reduction, when the valuation ring is Henselian, for instance complete, and its residue field is finite. Here the reduction of the integral model is singular at the origin, a₃, a₄, a₆ ∈ 𝔪, and its tangent quadratic T² + a₁ T − a₂ has no root in the residue field. For a discrete valuation, on a minimal equation, this is nonsplit multiplicative reduction of type Iₙ with n even.

At a nonsplit node with Δ a unit times a square, [E(F) : E₀(F)] = 2, when the valuation ring is Henselian, for instance complete, and its residue field is finite. Here the reduction of the integral model is singular at the origin, a₃, a₄, a₆ ∈ 𝔪, and its tangent quadratic T² + a₁ T − a₂ has no root in the residue field. For a discrete valuation, on a minimal equation, this is nonsplit multiplicative reduction of type Iₙ with n even, where Tate's algorithm reports the local index 2.

At nonsplit multiplicative reduction of even type I₂ₘ, [E(F) : E₀(F)] = 2, when the valuation ring is Henselian, for instance complete, and its residue field is finite. This is the local index c_v = 2 that Tate's algorithm reports there. Here ϖ generates the maximal ideal of the valuation ring, Tate's algorithm, run on the integral model with uniformiser ϖ, stops with the symbol I₂ₘ (ϖ ∣ a₃, ϖ ∣ a₄, ϖ ∣ a₆, ϖ ∤ b₂ and ϖ²ᵐ ∥ Δ), and the tangent quadratic T² + a₁ T − a₂ has no root in the residue field.