Documentation

TauCeti.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.Scheme.Addition.Unit

The unit law for the projective Weierstrass addition morphism #

Let W be an elliptic Weierstrass curve over a commutative ring R, let E = projModel W, and let S = Spec R. This file proves that the zero section is a right and a left identity for the Bosma–Lenstra addition morphism E ×_S E ⟶ E.

The proof is scheme-theoretic over an arbitrary base. The standard charts D₊(Y) and D₊(Z) cover E: the complement of D₊(Z) is exactly the zero section, which lies in D₊(Y). On D₊(Z), the addition law attached to Z = 0 evaluates at (P, [0 : 1 : 0]) to -P₂ • P; on D₊(Y), the law attached to Y = 0 evaluates to P₁ • P. The chosen chart coordinate is one in each case, so both laws define the original projective point. The left unit law follows from the right one, because the addition morphism is commutative (WeierstrassCurve.additionMorphism_comm).

Main results #

References #

@[simp]

The zero section is a right identity for the Bosma–Lenstra addition morphism on the projective Weierstrass model. This is an equality of scheme morphisms over an arbitrary commutative base ring; in particular, it does not follow merely from an equality on geometric points.

@[simp]

The zero section is a right identity for the Bosma–Lenstra addition morphism on the projective Weierstrass model. This is an equality of scheme morphisms over an arbitrary commutative base ring; in particular, it does not follow merely from an equality on geometric points.

@[simp]

The zero section is a left identity for the Bosma–Lenstra addition morphism on the projective Weierstrass model, over an arbitrary commutative base ring.

@[simp]

The zero section is a left identity for the Bosma–Lenstra addition morphism on the projective Weierstrass model, over an arbitrary commutative base ring.