Ranks of finite flat closed subschemes #
An inclusion of closed subschemes finite and flat over the same base is equality when their
rank functions agree. In ideal-sheaf notation the direction of containment is reversed:
I ≤ J gives the closed immersion J.subscheme ⟶ I.subscheme.
The intersection of two closed subschemes V(I) and V(J) of X can be cut out inside either
of them: as the inverse image V(I) ∩ V(J) = V(I.comap ι_J) of V(I) in V(J), or as the inverse
image V(J.comap ι_I) of V(J) in V(I). Both are the fibre product V(I) ×_X V(J), so when
V(I) and V(J) map to a base compatibly on their intersection, the two descriptions have the
same rank over the base (Scheme.IdealSheafData.finrank_comap_subschemeι_comm). For two curves on
a surface, this is the symmetry of the length of their scheme-theoretic intersection.
Main results #
AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.IdealSheafData.eq_of_le_of_finrank_eq: comparable ideal sheaves cutting out finite flat schemes of the same rank are equal;AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.IdealSheafData.finrank_comap_subschemeι_comm: the rank ofV(I) ∩ V(J)does not depend on which of the two subschemes it is cut out in.
Comparable ideal sheaves cutting out finite flat schemes of the same rank over the base are equal.
The intersection of two closed subschemes is symmetric. Let V(I) and V(J) be closed
subschemes of X mapping to a base S by f and g, compatibly on their fibre product. Then the
inverse image of V(I) in V(J) and the inverse image of V(J) in V(I), both the intersection
V(I) ∩ V(J), have the same rank over S when one of them is finite and flat over S.