The spectrum of an open subring of a Huber ring #
Let A be a Huber ring and B ⊆ A an open subring, with the subspace topology, and let
f : Spec A → Spec B be the morphism induced by the inclusion. Write T ⊆ Spec B for the set of
open prime ideals of B. Away from T the two spectra agree:
Tis Zariski closed: it is the zero locus of the elements ofBthat are topologically nilpotent inA;f⁻¹(T)is the set of open prime ideals ofA;frestricts to an isomorphism of schemes fromf⁻¹(Spec B ∖ T)ontoSpec B ∖ T.
The complement Spec B ∖ T is covered by the basic opens D(s) for s ∈ B topologically
nilpotent in A, and over D(s) the morphism f is Spec of the map B_s → A_s, which is an
isomorphism because s absorbs every element of A into the open subring B
(TauCeti.Localization.awayRingEquivOfIsTopologicallyNilpotent). Being an isomorphism is local on
the target, so f is an isomorphism over the union of these basic opens.
No completeness, separatedness or noetherian hypothesis enters. The main case is a ring of
definition B = A₀ with ideal of definition I, where Huber's sheafiness argument for rings with a
noetherian ring of definition uses this comparison to pass between Spec A₀ and Spec A away
from the primes containing I.
Main results #
Subring.setOf_isOpen_eq_zeroLocus: the open primes ofBare the zero locus of the elements ofBtopologically nilpotent inA.Subring.isClosed_setOf_isOpen: in particular they form a Zariski closed set.Subring.nonOpenPrimes: the non-open primes ofB, as an open subset ofSpec B.Subring.nonOpenPrimes_eq_iSup_basicOpen: it is covered by the basic opensD(s)fors ∈ Btopologically nilpotent inA.Subring.preimage_setOf_isOpen: the preimage inSpec Aof the open primes ofBis the set of open primes ofA.Subring.isIso_morphismRestrict_nonOpenPrimes:Spec A → Spec Brestricts to an isomorphism over the non-open primes ofB.
References #
- R. Huber, Continuous valuations, Math. Z. 212 (1993), Lemma 3.7 and its proof.
- R. Huber, A generalization of formal schemes and rigid analytic varieties, Math. Z. 217 (1994), §2, proof of (1.3.1)(i).
- Wedhorn, Adic Spaces, Lemma 7.44(1).
The open primes of a subring of a Huber ring are a zero locus: they are the primes containing every element of the subring that is topologically nilpotent in the ambient ring.
Huber, Continuous valuations, Lemma 3.7: the open primes of a subring of a Huber ring form a Zariski closed subset of its spectrum.
The prime ideals of a subring B of a Huber ring that are not open for the subspace topology,
as an open subset of Spec B: the complement of the closed set of open primes
(Subring.isClosed_setOf_isOpen).
Instances For
A prime of B lies in Subring.nonOpenPrimes B exactly when it is not open.
The non-open primes are covered by basic opens: the non-open primes of B are the union of
the basic opens D(s) for s ∈ B topologically nilpotent in the ambient ring.
Huber, Continuous valuations, Lemma 3.7: open primes pull back to open primes. For an
open subring B of a topological ring A, a prime of A is open exactly when its image in
Spec B is an open prime of B.
The preimage of the non-open primes of an open subring B of a Huber ring A is the set of
non-open primes of A: this is the source of the isomorphism
Subring.isIso_morphismRestrict_nonOpenPrimes.
Huber, Continuous valuations, Lemma 3.7: away from the open primes, an open subring has
the same spectrum. For an open subring B of a Huber ring A, the morphism
Spec A → Spec B restricts to an isomorphism over the non-open primes of B.