Effective divisors and integral fractional ideals #
For a Dedekind domain R with fraction field K,
fractionalIdealDivisorAddEquiv R K identifies invertible fractional ideals with Weil divisors
on the height-one spectrum of R. This file proves that the equivalence respects the positive
parts on both sides: a fractional ideal is contained in R exactly when all of its
height-one multiplicities are nonnegative.
Thus the affine Weil--Cartier dictionary restricts to an additive equivalence between integral
invertible fractional ideals and effective Weil divisors. This directly advances the
Weil ≃ Cartier divisor dictionary in Layer A of
TauCetiRoadmap/JacobianChallenge/README.md.
The reverse implication uses Mathlib's factorization of a nonzero fractional ideal as the finite product of its height-one prime powers. No external formalization is copied.
The additive submonoid of invertible fractional ideals contained in R.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Membership in integralFractionalIdealSubmonoid means that the fractional ideal is contained
in the base ring.
The divisor of an integral fractional ideal (one contained in R, i.e. ≤ 1) is effective:
integral ideals have no poles, only zeros. This is the affine "effective divisor ↔ integral ideal"
half of the dictionary.
If the divisor of an invertible fractional ideal is effective, then the fractional ideal is
integral. This is the converse of isEffective_fractionalIdealDivisor_of_le_one.
An invertible fractional ideal is integral exactly when its associated Weil divisor is effective.
The divisor of an invertible fractional ideal is effective exactly when that ideal belongs to the integral fractional-ideal submonoid.
The affine Weil--Cartier equivalence restricted to positive objects: integral invertible fractional ideals correspond exactly to effective Weil divisors.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The restricted equivalence agrees with fractionalIdealDivisor after forgetting
effectivity.
The inverse restricted equivalence agrees with the unrestricted inverse after forgetting integrality.