Documentation

TauCeti.AlgebraicTopology.Cellular.Homology

The homology of the cellular chain complex #

For a relative CW complex (X, A) write Xⁿ for its n-skeleton, so that X⁻¹ = A. This file proves the vanishing results on the relative singular homology of skeleta that drive the comparison of cellular and singular homology, and the first half of that comparison: the homology of the cellular chain complex in degree n is the relative singular homology Hₙ(Xⁿ⁺¹, X⁻¹) of the (n + 1)-skeleton.

The base X⁻¹ is skeletonLT C 0, which is the base of the complex by TauCeti.range_skeletonBasePair_snd; using it keeps the pair (X⁰, X⁻¹) identical to the skeletal pair TauCeti.skeletonPair C 0.

Coefficients are an object R of an abelian category with coproducts in which coproducts indexed by the cells of each dimension are exact, as for modules over a ring, or for any abelian category when the complex has finitely many cells in each dimension.

References #

The relative homology of consecutive skeleta vanishes outside the degree of their cells: Hₖ(Xⁿ, Xⁿ⁻¹) = 0 for k ≠ n, when coproducts indexed by the n-cells are exact.

The connecting morphism Hₙ₊₁(Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ) ⟶ Hₙ(Xⁿ, X⁻¹) of the triple (Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ, X⁻¹).

Equations
Instances For
    @[simp]

    The connecting morphism Hₙ₊₁(Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ) ⟶ Hₙ(Xⁿ, X⁻¹) followed by the map Hₙ(Xⁿ, X⁻¹) ⟶ Hₙ(Xⁿ⁺¹, X⁻¹) is zero.

    @[simp]

    The connecting morphism Hₙ₊₁(Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ) ⟶ Hₙ(Xⁿ, X⁻¹) followed by the map Hₙ(Xⁿ, X⁻¹) ⟶ Hₙ(Xⁿ⁺¹, X⁻¹) is zero.

    @[simp]

    The map Hₙ₊₁(Xⁿ⁺¹, X⁻¹) ⟶ Hₙ₊₁(Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ) followed by the connecting morphism Hₙ₊₁(Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ) ⟶ Hₙ(Xⁿ, X⁻¹) is zero.

    @[simp]

    The map Hₙ₊₁(Xⁿ⁺¹, X⁻¹) ⟶ Hₙ₊₁(Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ) followed by the connecting morphism Hₙ₊₁(Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ) ⟶ Hₙ(Xⁿ, X⁻¹) is zero.

    The cellular differential Hₙ₊₁(Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ) ⟶ Hₙ(Xⁿ, Xⁿ⁻¹) is the connecting morphism Hₙ₊₁(Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ) ⟶ Hₙ(Xⁿ, X⁻¹) of the triple (Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ, X⁻¹) followed by the map Hₙ(Xⁿ, X⁻¹) ⟶ Hₙ(Xⁿ, Xⁿ⁻¹).

    The cellular differential Hₙ₊₁(Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ) ⟶ Hₙ(Xⁿ, Xⁿ⁻¹) is the connecting morphism Hₙ₊₁(Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ) ⟶ Hₙ(Xⁿ, X⁻¹) of the triple (Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ, X⁻¹) followed by the map Hₙ(Xⁿ, X⁻¹) ⟶ Hₙ(Xⁿ, Xⁿ⁻¹).

    Exactness at Hₙ₊₁(Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ) in the long exact sequence of the triple (Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ, X⁻¹), stated with the maps of TauCeti.skeletonBasePair.

    Exactness at Hₙ(Xⁿ, X⁻¹) in the long exact sequence of the triple (Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ, X⁻¹), stated with the maps of TauCeti.skeletonBasePair.

    The map Hₙ(Xⁿ, X⁻¹) ⟶ Hₙ(Xⁿ⁺¹, X⁻¹) is an epimorphism: its cokernel embeds in Hₙ(Xⁿ⁺¹, Xⁿ) = 0.

    The homology of a skeleton relative to the base vanishes above its dimension: Hₖ(Xⁿ, X⁻¹) = 0 for n < k.

    The map Hₙ(Xⁿ, X⁻¹) ⟶ Hₙ(Xⁿ, Xⁿ⁻¹) is a monomorphism: its kernel is a quotient of Hₙ(Xⁿ⁻¹, X⁻¹) = 0.

    The homology of the cellular chain complex in degree n is the relative singular homology Hₙ(Xⁿ⁺¹, X⁻¹) of the (n + 1)-skeleton relative to the base.

    Equations
    Instances For