Alexander–Whitney diagonals for relative cup products #
The Alexander–Whitney diagonal C(X; T) ⟶ C(X; R) ⊗ C(X; S) of a space X sends a singular
simplex σ to ∑_{p + q = n} σ|[0, …, p] ⊗ σ|[p, …, n]. If σ lies in a subspace, so do its
front and back faces. This file records the two descents of the diagonal to relative chains along
which relative cup products are taken.
- For a pair
(X, A), the diagonal followed by the quotient map to relative chains on the second factor vanishes on the chains ofA, and descends toTopPair.rightAlexanderWhitneyDiagonal : C(X, A; T) ⟶ C(X; R) ⊗ C(X, A; S). It gives the actionHᵖ(X) × H^q(X, A) ⟶ Hⁿ(X, A)of absolute cohomology on relative cohomology. - For subsets
UandVofX, the diagonal followed by the quotient maps on both factors vanishes on the chains ofUand on those ofV, hence on the chainsC(U) + C(V)of the singular simplices ofXlying inUor inV(the subcomplexX.smallSingularSubcomplex ![U, V]). It descends toTopCat.relativeAlexanderWhitneyDiagonal : C(X; U + V; T) ⟶ C(X, U; R) ⊗ C(X, V; S), whereC(X; U + V)is the quotient ofC(X)byC(U) + C(V). WhenUandVare open inU ∪ V, the small-chain theorem identifiesC(X; U + V)withC(X, U ∪ V)up to quasi-isomorphism, which gives the relative cup productHᵖ(X, U) × H^q(X, V) ⟶ Hⁿ(X, U ∪ V).
Main definitions and results #
TopPair.rightAlexanderWhitneyDiagonal, characterized byTopPair.singularChainComplexπ_rightAlexanderWhitneyDiagonaland natural in maps of pairs (TopPair.rightAlexanderWhitneyDiagonal_naturality).TopCat.relativeAlexanderWhitneyDiagonal, characterized byTopCat.chainComplexπ_relativeAlexanderWhitneyDiagonaland natural in maps of spaces carryingUintoU'andVintoV'(TopCat.relativeAlexanderWhitneyDiagonal_naturality, along the maps of pairsTopCat.smallSingularSubcomplexPairMap).
References #
- A. Hatcher, Algebraic Topology,
Section 3.2, the relative cup product
Hᵏ(X, A) × Hˡ(X, B) ⟶ Hᵏ⁺ˡ(X, A ∪ B).
The right relative Alexander–Whitney diagonal C(X, A; T) ⟶ C(X; R) ⊗ C(X, A; S) of a
pair (X, A): the Alexander–Whitney diagonal C(X; T) ⟶ C(X; R) ⊗ C(X; S) of X followed by
the quotient map to relative chains on the second factor, which vanishes on the chains of A and
so descends to relative chains.
Instances For
The right relative Alexander–Whitney diagonal of a pair (X, A) is the descent of the
Alexander–Whitney diagonal of X, followed by the quotient map on the second factor.
The right relative Alexander–Whitney diagonal of a pair (X, A) is the descent of the
Alexander–Whitney diagonal of X, followed by the quotient map on the second factor.
The right relative Alexander–Whitney diagonal is natural in maps of pairs.
The right relative Alexander–Whitney diagonal is natural in maps of pairs.
The relative Alexander–Whitney diagonal C(X; U + V; T) ⟶ C(X, U; R) ⊗ C(X, V; S) for
subsets U and V of X, where C(X; U + V) is the quotient of the singular chains of X by the
chains of the singular simplices lying in U or in V: the Alexander–Whitney diagonal of X
followed by the quotient maps on both factors, which vanishes on those chains and so descends.
Instances For
The relative Alexander–Whitney diagonal is the descent of the Alexander–Whitney diagonal of
X, followed by the quotient maps on both factors.
The relative Alexander–Whitney diagonal is the descent of the Alexander–Whitney diagonal of
X, followed by the quotient maps on both factors.
The relative Alexander–Whitney diagonal is natural in maps f : X ⟶ Y carrying U into U'
and V into V'.
The relative Alexander–Whitney diagonal is natural in maps f : X ⟶ Y carrying U into U'
and V into V'.