Deck transformations as the opposite fundamental group #
For a regular covering map p : E → X with simply connected total space, the existing
comparison
Deck.IsRegular.fundamentalGroupEquiv : FundamentalGroup X x ≃* (deck p)ᵐᵒᵖ
pins the convention: monodromy acts on the right, whereas deck transformations act on the left. This file packages the equivalent deck-to-fundamental-group form
deck p ≃* (FundamentalGroup X x)ᵐᵒᵖ
and records its pointwise characterizations, for cover-classification arguments that pass between deck transformations, loop classes, and fibre points.
Main declarations #
TauCeti.Deck.IsRegular.deckFundamentalGroupEquiv: the deck group is isomorphic to the opposite fundamental group.TauCeti.Deck.IsRegular.deckFundamentalGroupEquiv_unop_monodromy: the loop class attached to a deck transformation has monodromy equal to that deck transformation on the chosen lift.TauCeti.Deck.IsRegular.deckEquivFiber_eq_fundamentalGroupEquivFiber: the deck-to-fibre equivalence and monodromy-to-fibre equivalence agree under this comparison.
References #
This is a formal consequence of TauCeti.Deck.IsRegular.fundamentalGroupEquiv, which in turn
uses Junyan Xu's IsQuotientCoveringMap.fundamentalGroupEquiv from
Mathlib.Topology.Homotopy.Lifting.
For a regular covering map p : E → X with simply connected total space, the deck group
is isomorphic to the opposite of the fundamental group of the base:
deck p ≃* (FundamentalGroup X x)ᵐᵒᵖ.
The opposite is the same convention as in fundamentalGroupEquiv: deck transformations act
on the left, while fundamental-group monodromy acts on the right.
Equations
- hreg.deckFundamentalGroupEquiv hp e = (MulEquiv.opOp ↥(deck p)).trans (MulEquiv.op (hreg.fundamentalGroupEquiv hp e).symm)
Instances For
The deck-to-fundamental-group equivalence sends a deck transformation to the opposite
of the loop class corresponding to the opposite deck transformation under
fundamentalGroupEquiv.
The inverse deck-to-fundamental-group equivalence sends op γ to the deck
transformation corresponding to γ under fundamentalGroupEquiv.
The loop class attached to a deck transformation has monodromy equal to that deck transformation on the chosen lift.
A deck transformation corresponds to a loop class exactly when that loop class's monodromy moves the chosen lift by the deck transformation.
The inverse comparison is characterized by the same monodromy formula.
A deck transformation maps to the identity loop class exactly when it fixes the chosen lift.
Under the deck-to-fundamental-group comparison, the deck-to-fibre equivalence for a
regular cover agrees with the monodromy equivalence from π₁ to the same fibre.