Dixon's h₁ and h₂ functions and their defining identity #
Dixon's proof of the homology form of Cauchy's theorem hinges on a single auxiliary function that
is analytic on all of ℂ. This file records its two constituent integrals and the algebraic
identity relating them; the analyticity, boundedness, and Liouville steps are developed downstream.
For a curve γ : ℝ → ℂ on the oriented interval with endpoints a, b and a function f:
dixonH1 f γ a b w = ∫ t in a..b, dslope f w (γ t) * deriv γ t— built from the difference quotientdslope f w z, which equals(f z - f w) / (z - w)forz ≠ wandderiv f watz = w, so the integrand is defined for everyw, including points onγ.dixonH2 f γ a b w = ∫ t in a..b, f (γ t) / (γ t - w) * deriv γ t— the Cauchy-type integral, defined forwoff the curve.dixonFunction f U γ a b w— selectsdixonH1onUanddixonH2on its complement.
Each definition is irreducible_def, exposing a public *_def equation lemma while keeping the
body opaque.
Main results #
TauCeti.Contour.dixonH1_eq_dixonH2_sub_windingNumber_mul_f— forγcontinuous onuIcc a bandwoff the curve, with the index and Cauchy-type integrands interval-integrable,dixonH1 f γ a b w = dixonH2 f γ a b w - 2πi · n(γ, w) · f w, wheren(γ, w)is the generalizedwindingNumber. This is what makesdixonFunctionwell-glued across∂U.
These are the building blocks of the homologyCauchyTheorem roadmap target
(TauCetiRoadmap/ContourIntegration/Suggested.lean, Layer 3, proved by Dixon's argument).
Provenance #
Adapted from dixonH1, dixonH2, dixonFunction, and dixonH1_eq_dixonH2_sub_winding_f in
DixonDef.lean of the AINTLIB LeanModularForms development, restated for a raw γ : ℝ → ℂ on an
oriented interval with endpoints a and b. See J. D. Dixon, A brief proof of Cauchy's integral
theorem, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 29 (1971), and N. Hungerbühler, M. Wasem, A generalized notion of
winding numbers.
Dixon's h₂ integral ∫ t in a..b, f (γ t) / (γ t - w) * deriv γ t, the ordinary
Cauchy-type integral, defined for w off the curve.
Instances For
Dixon's glued function: dixonH1 on U, dixonH2 on its complement. That these two pieces
glue, under null-homology, into a function analytic on all of ℂ is the downstream content of
Dixon's argument, established in later results; here the function is only defined.
Equations
- TauCeti.Contour.dixonFunction f U γ a b w = if w ∈ U then TauCeti.Contour.dixonH1 f γ a b w else TauCeti.Contour.dixonH2 f γ a b w
Instances For
The h₁/h₂ identity. For γ continuous on uIcc a b and w off the curve, with the
index and Cauchy-type integrands interval-integrable, dixonH1 f γ a b w differs from
dixonH2 f γ a b w by exactly 2πi · n(γ, w) · f w, the generalized winding number of γ about
w scaled by f w.