The comparison principle for the Monge–Ampère equation #
Let Ω be a bounded open convex subset of a finite-dimensional real inner product space E,
and let u and v be convex on Ω and continuous on its closure, with Aleksandrov
Monge–Ampère measures MA_u and MA_v (of u and v extended by ⊤ off Ω).
- If
u ≤ vonΩandv ≤ uon the frontier ofΩ, then every subgradient ofvrelative toΩis a subgradient ofurelative toΩ, soMA_v(Ω) ≤ MA_u(Ω): the lower function carries more Monge–Ampère mass. - The comparison principle. If
MA_u ≤ MA_vandv ≤ uon the frontier ofΩ, thenv ≤ uonΩ. Hence a convex function onΩ, continuous on the closure, is determined by its Monge–Ampère measure and its boundary values; this is the uniqueness half of the Dirichlet problem for the Monge–Ampère equation.
The comparison principle is proved by contradiction. If u x₀ < v x₀, then for small ε > 0
the function w = (1 + ε) v + b of TauCeti.exists_convexOn_lt_frontier_of_lt lies above u at
x₀ and strictly below u on the frontier, so the open set G = {u < w} of
TauCeti.exists_isOpen_subset_pos_forall_frontier_le has closure inside Ω, and w ≤ u on its
frontier. By TauCeti.exists_forall_add_inner_add_le_of_forall_frontier_le, the subgradients of
w on G are subgradients of u on G, as are their small perturbations, which form an open
ball.
The scaling law (MeasureTheory.Measure.mongeAmpereMeasure_ite_mul_add_of_pos) gives
MA_w(G) = (1 + ε)^n MA_v(G). Comparing measures,
(1 + ε) ^ n MA_v(G) ≤ MA_u(G) ≤ MA_v(G) with 0 < MA_u(G) and MA_v(G) < ∞, which is
impossible.
Main statements #
TauCeti.mongeAmpereMeasure_le_of_le_of_le_frontier— a convex function lying below another, with the reverse inequality on the frontier, has larger Monge–Ampère mass;TauCeti.le_of_mongeAmpereMeasure_le_of_le_frontier— the comparison principle;TauCeti.eqOn_of_mongeAmpereMeasure_eq_of_eqOn_frontier— two convex functions with the same Monge–Ampère measure and the same boundary values agree.TauCeti.abs_sub_le_of_smul_le_mongeAmpereMeasure_le_smul— two-sided measure bounds give a quantitative comparison with a zero-boundary reference.
References #
- C. E. Gutiérrez, The Monge–Ampère Equation, 2nd ed., Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications 89, Birkhäuser, 2016, §1.4.
- A. Figalli, The Monge–Ampère Equation and Its Applications, Zurich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics, EMS, 2017, Chapter 2.
- G. De Philippis and A. Figalli, The Monge–Ampère equation and its link to optimal transportation, §2.4, the perturbation argument.
- The density bracketing follows the KLS formalization.
A lower convex function with the reverse boundary inequality has more Monge–Ampère mass.
Let Ω be a bounded open set, and let u and v be convex on Ω and continuous on its
closure, with u ≤ v on Ω and v ≤ u on the frontier of Ω. Then MA_v(Ω) ≤ MA_u(Ω) for
the Monge–Ampère measures of u and v (extended by ⊤ off Ω) with respect to any measure
μ absolutely continuous with respect to an additive Haar measure.
The comparison principle for the Monge–Ampère equation. Let Ω be a bounded open subset
of a real inner product space E of finite dimension n ≥ 1, and let u and v be convex on
Ω and continuous on its closure. If MA_u ≤ MA_v for their Aleksandrov Monge–Ampère measures
(of u and v extended by ⊤ off Ω, with respect to an additive Haar measure μ) and
v ≤ u on the frontier of Ω, then v ≤ u on Ω.
Uniqueness for the Dirichlet problem for the Monge–Ampère equation. Let Ω be a bounded
open subset of a real inner product space of finite dimension n ≥ 1, and let u and v be
convex on Ω and continuous on its closure. If u and v have the same Aleksandrov
Monge–Ampère measure (extended by ⊤ off Ω, with respect to an additive Haar measure μ) and
agree on the frontier of Ω, then they agree on Ω.
Quantitative comparison. On a bounded open set, suppose the convex potentials u
and v are continuous on the closure and vanish on the frontier. If the Monge–Ampère
measure of v is ν and that of u lies between (1 - ε)^n • ν and (1 + ε)^n • ν
for 0 ≤ ε < 1, then |u - v| ≤ ε |v| pointwise.