The weak maximum principle for subharmonic functions #
TauCeti.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Laplacian.MaximumPrinciple proves the strict boundary
maximum principle: a C² function with 0 < Δ f on the interior of a compact set attains its
maximum on the frontier. That strict hypothesis is only a warm-up; the theorem PDE theory
actually uses is the weak maximum principle, which relaxes 0 < Δ f to the borderline
0 ≤ Δ f (subharmonic). This file supplies it, in bound form and in the extremum (∃) form.
Main declarations #
TauCeti.le_of_laplacian_nonneg_le_frontier: weak maximum principle. A continuous function on a compact set that isC²and subharmonic (0 ≤ Δ f) on the interior is bounded on all ofKby any bound it satisfies onfrontier K.TauCeti.ge_of_laplacian_nonpos_ge_frontier: the dual weak minimum principle for superharmonic functions (Δ f ≤ 0).TauCeti.exists_mem_frontier_isMaxOn_of_laplacian_nonneg/TauCeti.exists_mem_frontier_isMinOn_of_laplacian_nonpos: on a nonempty compact set in a nontrivial finite-dimensional real inner product space, a subharmonic (resp. superharmonic) function attains a maximum (resp. minimum) on the frontier.
The ε → 0 limit of a perturbation estimate: if a ≤ m + ε * C for every ε > 0, with a
nonnegative constant C, then a ≤ m. This packages the endgame of the perturbation arguments in
the weak maximum principles.
If every upper bound for a continuous function on the frontier of a nonempty compact set is also an upper bound on the whole set, then the function attains a maximum on the frontier.
The Laplacian of the perturbation f + ε‖·‖² at a point where f is C²: it exceeds Δ f by
the contribution ε * (2 * dim E) of the strictly convex term ε‖·‖². This is the computation the
bare-Laplacian and the -Δ + c weak maximum principles both run on the perturbed function.
The ε → 0 perturbation engine of the weak maximum principles. To bound f x ≤ m on a
bounded set K, it suffices to produce, for every ε > 0, a point z ∈ K at which the
perturbation f + ε‖·‖² attains its maximum over K and where f z ≤ m: bounding ‖·‖² by a
constant on the bounded K and letting ε → 0 then gives f x ≤ m. The bare-Laplacian and
-Δ + c weak maximum principles differ only in how they produce such a maximizer, so this lemma
packages everything they share.
Weak maximum principle for subharmonic functions.
Let K be compact. If f is continuous on K, is C² on interior K, and is subharmonic
there (0 ≤ Δ f), then any bound m that f respects on frontier K bounds f on all of K.
Weak minimum principle for superharmonic functions.
The dual of le_of_laplacian_nonneg_le_frontier: a continuous, C², superharmonic (Δ f ≤ 0)
function on a compact set is bounded below on K by any lower bound it respects on frontier K.
A subharmonic (0 ≤ Δ f) continuous function on a nonempty compact set in a nontrivial
finite-dimensional real inner product space attains a maximum on the frontier. This is the
∃-form of the weak maximum principle, mirroring
exists_mem_frontier_isMaxOn_of_laplacian_pos for the strict case.
A superharmonic (Δ f ≤ 0) continuous function on a nonempty compact set in a nontrivial
finite-dimensional real inner product space attains a minimum on the frontier.