The second fundamental form of a map into an inner product space #
Let i : V โ E be a map from a finite-dimensional normed space over ๐ = โ or โ into an inner
product space over ๐. Its tangent space at x is the range of the derivative Di(x), and its
normal space is the orthogonal complement (Di(x)).rangeแฎ. The second fundamental form
TauCeti.secondFundamentalForm ๐ i x is the normal component of the second derivative,
B(v, w) = P_N (Dยฒi(x)(v, w)),
where P_N is the orthogonal projection onto the normal space. When i is an immersion
parametrising a submanifold of E, this is the second fundamental form of the submanifold,
evaluated on the tangent vectors Di(x) v and Di(x) w (the Gauss formula). It is symmetric,
and it is unchanged by a reparametrisation of the source, up to the derivative of the
reparametrisation: the second derivative of a change of coordinates contributes only a tangent
term, which the projection removes.
For a holomorphic map into a complex inner product space, the real and complex constructions are
compared. Equip E with the real inner product re โชx, yโซ. The real tangent space and the real
normal space are then complex subspaces, so multiplication by I (the complex structure J)
preserves both. The real second fundamental form secondFundamentalForm โ i x agrees with the
complex-bilinear, normal-valued form secondFundamentalForm โ i x, which gives the identities
B(Jv, w) = J B(v, w) = B(v, Jw) and B(Jv, Jw) = -B(v, w).
These identities are what make the shape operators of a complex submanifold anticommute with J,
so that their eigenvalues come in pairs ยฑฮป.
Main definitions #
TauCeti.secondFundamentalForm ๐ i x: the normal component of the second derivative ofi.
Main results #
TauCeti.secondFundamentalForm_apply_mem_orthogonal: the second fundamental form is normal-valued.TauCeti.inner_secondFundamentalForm_apply_of_mem_orthogonal: against a normal vector, the second fundamental form pairs like the second derivative.ContDiffAt.secondFundamentalForm_apply_comm: symmetry.ContDiffAt.secondFundamentalForm_comp: invariance under reparametrisation of the source.DifferentiableAt.orthogonal_range_fderiv_restrictScalars: the real normal space of a holomorphic map is its complex normal space.ContDiffAt.secondFundamentalForm_restrictScalars_apply: the real second fundamental form of a holomorphic map is its complex second fundamental form.ContDiffAt.secondFundamentalForm_I_smul_left,ContDiffAt.secondFundamentalForm_I_smul_right,ContDiffAt.secondFundamentalForm_I_smul_I_smul: the identities displayed above.
References #
- J. Milnor, Morse Theory, Princeton University Press, 1963, Section 7.
- S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry, Vol. II, Chapter IX.
- J. M. Lee, Introduction to Riemannian Manifolds, 2nd ed., Springer, 2018, Chapter 8.
The second fundamental form of i : V โ E at x: the component of the second derivative
Dยฒi(x)(v, w) orthogonal to the tangent space (Di(x)).range. For an immersion this is the
second fundamental form of the parametrised submanifold, evaluated on Di(x) v and Di(x) w.
Instances For
The second fundamental form is the normal projection of the second derivative.
The second fundamental form takes values in the normal space.
Paired with a normal vector ฮฝ, the second fundamental form agrees with the second
derivative: โชฮฝ, B(v, w)โซ = โชฮฝ, Dยฒi(x)(v, w)โซ.
The second fundamental form of a Cยฒ map is symmetric.
Invariance under reparametrisation. If ฯ : W โ V is Cยฒ at y with surjective
derivative, then the second fundamental form of i โ ฯ at y is that of i at ฯ y, evaluated
on the images under Dฯ(y). The term Di(Dยฒฯ(v, w)) of the second-order chain rule is tangent,
and the normal projection removes it.
Holomorphic maps #
The real inner product re โชx, yโซ on a complex inner product space is enabled locally; the real
second fundamental form below is taken with respect to it.
The real normal space of a complex-differentiable map, for the real inner product
re โชx, yโซ, is its complex normal space; in particular it is stable under multiplication
by I.
The real second fundamental form of a holomorphic map is its complex second fundamental form. In particular it is complex bilinear.
The real second fundamental form of a holomorphic map satisfies B(Jv, w) = J B(v, w).
The real second fundamental form of a holomorphic map satisfies B(v, Jw) = J B(v, w).
The real second fundamental form of a holomorphic map satisfies B(Jv, Jw) = -B(v, w).