Divisors and orders of meromorphic functions #
Divisor values record finite meromorphic orders, while local finiteness controls sums over their support.
At a point z ∈ U, Mathlib's MeromorphicOn.divisor f U evaluates to
(meromorphicOrderAt f z).untop₀, while zero counts of analytic functions are stated in terms of
analyticOrderNatAt f z. The comparison identifies the local multiplicity. Local finiteness
also gives finite divisor support on subsets of compact sets and bounded regions whose
closures lie in the meromorphic domain. For whole-space divisors, it makes norm sublevels
of support finite and bounds sums over their subsets by the corresponding closed-ball count.
Main results #
MeromorphicOn.divisor_eq_analyticOrderNatAt— at a point wherefis analytic, the divisor readsanalyticOrderNatAt f z.MeromorphicOn.divisor_norm_sublevel_finite— finitely many support points occur in each norm sublevel over a proper normed field.AnalyticOnNhd.tsum_divisor_subtype_le_sum_closedBall— a support-subset multiplicity sum is bounded by the containing closed-ball count.MeromorphicOn.meromorphicOrderAt_eq_of_divisor_eq— equal divisors determine equal finite meromorphic orders.MeromorphicOn.divisor_finite_inter_support_of_isCompact— finite divisor support on a subset of a compact set in the meromorphic domain.MeromorphicOn.divisor_finite_inter_support— finite divisor support on a bounded region whose closure lies in the meromorphic domain.
The divisor of a whole-space function has finitely many support points in every norm sublevel set over a proper normed field. No meromorphy hypothesis on the representative is needed because its divisor is zero when it is not meromorphic.
Summing divisor multiplicities over a bounded subset of whole-space support is bounded by the divisor count on the containing closed ball.
At a point z ∈ U where a function meromorphic on U is analytic, its divisor on U
equals its order of vanishing analyticOrderNatAt f z. This includes a point near which f
vanishes identically: there the analytic order is infinite and both sides read 0.
The divisor is defined through meromorphicOrderAt, while zero counts of analytic functions are
stated through analyticOrderNatAt; this lemma translates between the two, so that a statement
about divisor values of a function analytic on U becomes one about its orders of vanishing. It
says nothing at a pole, where f is not analytic.
Equal divisors determine equal meromorphic orders at a point where both orders are finite. The two functions may take values in different normed spaces over the same field.
A meromorphic divisor has finite support on any subset of a compact set in its domain. For f
not meromorphic on U the divisor is zero.
A bounded region has finite divisor support when its closure is in the meromorphic domain.