Dissipativity under a bounded perturbation #
Adding a bounded operator B to an unbounded operator A costs at most ‖B‖ of dissipativity:
if A is dissipative then B + A - ‖B‖ I is again dissipative, because the triangle inequality
absorbs B x into the extra ‖B‖ ‖x‖ gained by shifting the spectral parameter. Maximality is
inherited too: the range condition for the perturbed operator comes from the Neumann
perturbation of a resolvent point
(ContinuousLinearMap.mem_resolventSet_vadd), applied at a spectral parameter large enough that
‖B‖ ‖R(lambda, A)‖ < 1.
Together these say that the Lumer--Phillips hypothesis set is stable under bounded
perturbations, which is what makes the bounded perturbation theorem for generators
(TauCeti.Semigroups.IsMDissipative.exists_stronglyContinuousSemigroup_generator_eq_vadd) a
consequence of Lumer--Phillips.
Main results #
TauCeti.Semigroups.IsDissipative.subScalar_vadd:B + A - ‖B‖ Iis dissipative.TauCeti.Semigroups.IsMDissipative.subScalar_vadd:B + A - ‖B‖ Iis m-dissipative.
References #
Engel--Nagel, One-Parameter Semigroups for Linear Evolution Equations, Section III.1; Pazy, Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations, Chapter 3, Theorem 1.1.
Dissipativity survives a bounded perturbation, at the cost of shifting by ‖B‖: if A
is dissipative and B is bounded, then B + A - ‖B‖ I is dissipative.
Maximal dissipativity survives a bounded perturbation. If A is m-dissipative and B is
bounded, then B + A - ‖B‖ I is m-dissipative.