Documentation

TauCeti.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Stampacchia

Stampacchia's lemma #

Let φ be nonnegative and nonincreasing on [k₀, ∞), and suppose that

φ h ≤ (M / (h - k)) ^ α * φ k ^ β whenever k₀ ≤ k < h,

with M > 0, α > 0 and β > 1. Then φ vanishes at the finite level

k₀ + d, where d = M * φ k₀ ^ ((β - 1) / α) * 2 ^ (β / (β - 1)).

This is the numerical lemma behind Stampacchia's proof of global boundedness for weak solutions of elliptic equations. There φ h is the measure of the superlevel set {u > h} of a weak subsolution u, and testing the equation against (u - k)⁺, combined with the Sobolev and Chebyshev inequalities, gives the recursive inequality. The conclusion φ (k₀ + d) = 0 says that u ≤ k₀ + d almost everywhere.

The proof evaluates φ along the levels kⱼ = k₀ + d (1 - 2⁻ʲ), which increase to k₀ + d. The values φ kⱼ satisfy the superlinear recurrence of TauCeti.le_geom_of_le_mul_pow_mul_rpow, with the choice of d making the starting value exactly small enough, so they decay geometrically; since φ (k₀ + d) ≤ φ kⱼ for every j, it vanishes.

Main declarations #

References #

theorem TauCeti.apply_add_eq_zero_of_le_div_sub_rpow_mul_rpow {φ : ℝ → ℝ} {k₀ M α β : ℝ} (hM : 0 < M) (hα : 0 < α) (hβ : 1 < β) (hφ : ∀ (h : ℝ), k₀ ≤ h → 0 ≤ φ h) (hanti : AntitoneOn φ (Set.Ici k₀)) (hrec : ∀ (k h : ℝ), k₀ ≤ k → k < h → φ h ≤ (M / (h - k)) ^ α * φ k ^ β) :
φ (k₀ + M * φ k₀ ^ ((β - 1) / α) * 2 ^ (β / (β - 1))) = 0

Stampacchia's lemma. Let φ be nonnegative and antitone on [k₀, ∞), with

φ h ≤ (M / (h - k)) ^ α * φ k ^ β whenever k₀ ≤ k < h,

for constants M > 0, α > 0 and β > 1. Then φ (k₀ + d) = 0, where d = M * φ k₀ ^ ((β - 1) / α) * 2 ^ (β / (β - 1)).