Acyclic complexes over an exact category #
A cochain complex K over an exact category is acyclic when each differential factors as a
deflation followed by an inflation, Kⁿ ↠ Zⁿ⁺¹ ↣ Kⁿ⁺¹, such that every sequence
Zⁿ ↣ Kⁿ ↠ Zⁿ⁺¹ is a conflation (Bühler, Definition 10.1). For the abelian exact structure these
are the exact complexes. Acyclic complexes are the complexes inverted to zero in the derived
category of an exact category.
The acyclic complexes contain zero and are closed under isomorphisms of complexes, shifts and
direct sums. The main result is Neeman's lemma: the mapping cone of a chain map φ : K ⟶ L
between acyclic complexes is acyclic. Write ZₙK ↣ Kⁿ and ZₙL ↣ Lⁿ for the cycles; φ restricts
to gₙ : ZₙK ⟶ ZₙL. The cycles Wₙ of the cone are the pushouts of ZₙK ↣ Kⁿ along gₙ, which
are extensions of Zₙ₊₁K by ZₙL, and gluing the pullback square at n with the pushout square
at n + 1 (TauCeti.ExactStructure.conflation_shortComplex'_of_isPullback_of_isPushout) gives the
conflations Wₙ ↣ Kⁿ⁺¹ ⊞ Lⁿ ↠ Wₙ₊₁ of the cone.
Main definitions #
TauCeti.ExactStructure.AcyclicData: a factorization of the differentials of a complex through conflations.TauCeti.ExactStructure.acyclic: the acyclic complexes of an exact structure, characterized byTauCeti.ExactStructure.acyclic_iff.
Main results #
TauCeti.ExactStructure.acyclic_biprod, and instances for isomorphisms, shifts and zero.TauCeti.ExactStructure.acyclic_mappingCone: Neeman's lemma, the mapping cone of a chain map between acyclic complexes is acyclic.
References #
- Theo Bühler, Exact categories, Expositiones Mathematicae 28 (2010), 1--69, https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.1480, Definition 10.1 and Lemma 10.3.
- Amnon Neeman, The derived category of an exact category, J. Algebra 135 (1990), 388--394, Lemma 1.1.
A witness that a cochain complex K is acyclic for an exact structure E: objects Z n and
a factorization K.X n ↠ Z (n + 1) ↣ K.X (n + 1) of each differential such that every
Z n ↣ K.X n ↠ Z (n + 1) is a conflation.
- Z : ℤ → C
The objects of cycles.
The inflation of the cycles into the complex.
The deflation onto the next cycles.
Instances For
A cochain complex is acyclic for an exact structure E when each differential factors as
a deflation followed by an inflation, K.X n ↠ Z (n + 1) ↣ K.X (n + 1), such that every sequence
Z n ↣ K.X n ↠ Z (n + 1) is a conflation.
Instances For
A complex is acyclic exactly when it has acyclicity data.
Acyclicity data make a complex acyclic.
Acyclicity data for a complex all of whose terms are zero.
Instances For
Acyclicity data transported along an isomorphism of complexes.
Instances For
Acyclicity data for a direct sum of two complexes.
Instances For
Acyclicity data for a shift of a complex: the cycles are shifted, and the deflations pick up the sign of the shifted differential.
Instances For
The morphism out of the cycles Zⁿ⁺¹ induced by a morphism out of Kⁿ killing Zⁿ ↣ Kⁿ.
Instances For
An acyclic complex stays acyclic under isomorphism of complexes.
The zero complex is acyclic.
A shift of an acyclic complex is acyclic.
A direct sum of acyclic complexes is acyclic.
Neeman's lemma: the mapping cone of a chain map between acyclic complexes is acyclic (Bühler, Lemma 10.3).
The mapping cone of a map built from pushouts of inflations is acyclic. Let φ : K ⟶ L
come with objects Bᵐ, inflations j : Bᵐ ↣ Lᵐ and pushout squares
Bᵐ ──j──▶ Lᵐ
│q │u
▼ ▼
Kᵐ⁺¹ ─v─▶ Bᵐ⁺¹
such that the differential of L is u ≫ j, φ is v ≫ j, the differential of K is v ≫ q
and u ≫ q = 0. Then the cone of φ is acyclic, with cycles Bᵐ: the pushout conflations
Bᵐ ↣ Lᵐ ⊞ Kᵐ⁺¹ ↠ Bᵐ⁺¹ are its degreewise conflations. This is the dual of the last step of
Bühler's proof of Theorem 12.7, where such data come from a recursive construction.
Acyclicity of mapping cones is invariant under isomorphisms of arrows, through Mathlib's
HomologicalComplex.homotopyCofiber.mapArrowIso.