Conflations along admissible base change, and the Noether conflation #
Quillen's axiom E2 produces a pushout of an inflation along an arbitrary morphism and asserts
only that the resulting morphism is again an inflation. This file identifies the cokernel of
that inflation: cobase change of a conflation X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z along u : X ⟶ X' produces a
conflation X' ⟶ Q ⟶ Z with the same third term. Dually, base change of a conflation along
u : Z' ⟶ Z produces a conflation X ⟶ Q ⟶ Z' with the same first term.
The second half of the file uses this to describe the conflations attached to a composite of two
inflations. If X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z and Y ⟶ W ⟶ V are conflations, then the pushout Q of the
inflation Y ⟶ W along the deflation Y ⟶ Z is at once the third term of a conflation
X ⟶ W ⟶ Q and the second term of a conflation Z ⟶ Q ⟶ V. This is the exact-category form of
Noether's second isomorphism theorem, Q ≅ W/X with (W/X)/(Y/X) ≅ W/Y, and it is what makes
extension-closed subcategories inherit axiom E1.
Main definitions #
TauCeti.cobaseChange: the conflationX' ⟶ Q ⟶ Zobtained fromS : X ⟶ Y ⟶ Zand a pushout square alongu : X ⟶ X'.TauCeti.baseChange: the conflationX ⟶ Q ⟶ Z'obtained fromS : X ⟶ Y ⟶ Zand a pullback square alongu : Z' ⟶ Z.
Main results #
TauCeti.ExactStructure.conflation_cobaseChangeandTauCeti.ExactStructure.conflation_baseChange: base and cobase change of a conflation along an arbitrary morphism is a conflation; the inflation or deflation in the original conflation is the admissible morphism being pushed out or pulled back.TauCeti.ExactStructure.conflation_comp_of_isPushoutandTauCeti.ExactStructure.conflation_comp_of_isPullback: the cokernel of a composite of inflations, and the kernel of a composite of deflations, computed as a pushout resp. pullback.TauCeti.ExactStructure.exists_conflation_comp: the Noether package for a composite of two inflations.
References #
- Theo Bühler, Exact categories, Expositiones Mathematicae 28 (2010), 1--69, https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.1480. Proposition 2.12 identifies the cokernel along a cobase change and Lemma 3.5 is the Noether isomorphism proved here.
The morphism Q ⟶ S.X₃ out of a cobase change of S.f along u, induced by S.g on the
one summand and by 0 on the other.
Equations
- TauCeti.cobaseChangeπ S sq = sq.desc S.g 0 ⋯
Instances For
The cobase change of a short complex S along u : S.X₁ ⟶ X': the short complex
X' ⟶ Q ⟶ S.X₃ attached to a pushout square of S.f along u.
Equations
- TauCeti.cobaseChange S sq = { X₁ := X', X₂ := Q, X₃ := S.X₃, f := w, g := TauCeti.cobaseChangeπ S sq, zero := ⋯ }
Instances For
The defining equation for cobaseChange.
The morphism S.X₁ ⟶ Q into a base change of S.g along u, induced by S.f on the one
factor and by 0 on the other.
Equations
- TauCeti.baseChangeι S sq = sq.lift S.f 0 ⋯
Instances For
The base change of a short complex S along u : Z' ⟶ S.X₃: the short complex
S.X₁ ⟶ Q ⟶ Z' attached to a pullback square of S.g along u.
Equations
- TauCeti.baseChange S sq = { X₁ := S.X₁, X₂ := Q, X₃ := Z', f := TauCeti.baseChangeι S sq, g := w, zero := ⋯ }
Instances For
The defining equation for baseChange.
Cobase change of a conflation is a conflation with the same cokernel. The pushout of a
conflation X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z along a morphism u : X ⟶ X' is a conflation X' ⟶ Q ⟶ Z.
Axiom E2 alone gives only that X' ⟶ Q is an inflation; the content here is that its cokernel
may be taken to be the original Z.
Base change of a conflation is a conflation with the same kernel. The pullback of a
conflation X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z along a morphism u : Z' ⟶ Z is a conflation X ⟶ Q ⟶ Z'.
The cokernel of a composite of inflations. If X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z and Y ⟶ W ⟶ V are
conflations, then the pushout Q of the inflation Y ⟶ W along the deflation Y ⟶ Z is a
cokernel of the composite inflation X ⟶ W.
The kernel of a composite of deflations. If X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z and V ⟶ W ⟶ Y are conflations,
then the pullback Q of the deflation W ⟶ Y along the inflation X ⟶ Y is a kernel of the
composite deflation W ⟶ Z.
The Noether isomorphism for exact categories. Given conflations X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z and
Y ⟶ W ⟶ V, there is an object Q — the pushout of Y ⟶ W along Y ⟶ Z — which is at once
the cokernel of the composite inflation X ⟶ W and an extension of V by Z.
In the classical notation Q ≅ W/X, and the second conflation is
Y/X ⟶ W/X ⟶ W/Y. This is Bühler's Lemma 3.5, and it is exactly what an extension-closed
subcategory needs in order to inherit axiom E1.
The dual Noether isomorphism. Given conflations X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z and V ⟶ W ⟶ Y, the
pullback Q of W ⟶ Y along X ⟶ Y is at once the kernel of the composite deflation
W ⟶ Z and an extension of X by V.