Documentation

TauCeti.CategoryTheory.Exact.Split

The split exact structure on an additive category #

Every additive category C carries a Quillen exact structure ExactStructure.split C whose conflations are the short complexes admitting a splitting, that is, the short complexes isomorphic to X ⟶ X ⊞ Z ⟶ Z.

In this exact structure a morphism i : X ⟶ Y is an inflation exactly when it is the inclusion of a biproduct summand: there are an object Z and an isomorphism e : Y ≅ X ⊞ Z with i ≫ e.hom = biprod.inl. Being a split monomorphism is not enough, because the complementary summand need not exist; the two notions agree as soon as the relevant idempotent splits.

The split structure is the smallest exact structure on C: the last section proves that a short complex with a splitting is a conflation for every exact structure E on C. This is Bühler's Lemma 2.7, and it is what makes the comparison out of split K₀ available for an arbitrary exact structure.

Main definitions #

Main results #

References #

@[reducible, inline]

The biproduct short complex X ⟶ X ⊞ Z ⟶ Z. Up to isomorphism these are exactly the conflations of the split exact structure.

Equations
Instances For

    The class of short complexes admitting a splitting. These are the conflations of the split exact structure.

    Equations
    Instances For
      @[simp]

      The split conflations are exactly the short complexes admitting a splitting.

      The short complex Z ⟶ X ⊞ Z ⟶ X on the other biproduct summand is a split conflation.

      Every split inflation is a split monomorphism. The converse fails in general: a split monomorphism is an inflation only once its complementary idempotent splits.

      Every split deflation is a split epimorphism.

      The split inflations are the biproduct inclusions. A split monomorphism whose complementary idempotent does not split is not an inflation of the split exact structure.

      E1 for the split exact structure: a composite of split inflations is a split inflation. The cokernel of i ≫ j is the biproduct of the two cokernels.

      E1op for the split exact structure: a composite of split deflations is a split deflation. The kernel of p ≫ q is the biproduct of the two kernels.

      E2 for the split exact structure: the pushout of a split inflation i : A ⟶ B along an arbitrary g : A ⟶ A' exists and its cobase change is again a split inflation. Concretely, if B ≅ A ⊞ Z identifies i with biprod.inl, then the pushout is A' ⊞ Z.

      E2op for the split exact structure: the pullback of a split deflation p : Y ⟶ Z along an arbitrary f : A ⟶ Z exists and its base change is again a split deflation. Concretely, if Y ≅ X ⊞ Z identifies p with biprod.snd, then the pullback is X ⊞ A.

      The split exact structure on an additive category: its conflations are the short complexes admitting a splitting.

      Its conflations are only the split short complexes, whereas those of the canonical exact structure of an abelian category are all the short exact ones; see TauCeti.ExactStructure.conflation_of_splitting for the general comparison.

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For
        @[simp]

        The conflations of the split exact structure are exactly the short complexes admitting a splitting.

        The graph biprod.lift (𝟙 X) g : X ⟶ X ⊞ Z of a morphism g : X ⟶ Z is a split inflation: the shear (x, z) ↦ (x, z - g x) carries it to biprod.inl.

        The map biprod.desc (𝟙 X) g : X ⊞ Z ⟶ X is a split deflation: the shear (x, z) ↦ (x + g z, z) carries it to the projection onto X.

        The graph biprod.lift g (𝟙 X) : X ⟶ Z ⊞ X of a morphism g : X ⟶ Z and the map biprod.desc (𝟙 Z) (-g) : Z ⊞ X ⟶ Z form a split conflation X ⟶ Z ⊞ X ⟶ Z.

        The graph biprod.lift (𝟙 X) g : X ⟶ X ⊞ Z of a morphism g : X ⟶ Z and the map biprod.desc g (-𝟙 Z) : X ⊞ Z ⟶ Z form a split conflation X ⟶ X ⊞ Z ⟶ Z.

        A morphism of Cᵒᵖ is a split inflation exactly when its unopposite is a split deflation of C: splittings of short complexes correspond under ShortComplex.Splitting.op and ShortComplex.Splitting.unop.

        @[simp]

        In every exact structure the biproduct short complex X ⟶ X ⊞ Z ⟶ Z is a conflation.

        No exact structure can therefore omit a biproduct decomposition. This is the key step of Bühler's Lemma 2.7, from which TauCeti.ExactStructure.conflation_of_splitting — the minimality of the split exact structure — follows by closure under isomorphisms.

        A short complex with a splitting is a conflation of every exact structure. Equivalently, the split exact structure is the smallest exact structure on C.

        The trivial conflation 0 ↪ X ↠ X, split by the identity.