Documentation

TauCeti.CategoryTheory.Exact.Stable.Cone

The cone of a morphism in a Frobenius exact category #

Let E be a Frobenius exact structure with chosen conflations X ⟶ I(X) ⟶ ΣX. The cone of a morphism f : X ⟶ Y is the pushout

X  --i(X)-->  I(X)
|               |
-f              |
v               v
Y  ------->  cone f

of the chosen inflation of X along -f. The sign is what makes the associated conflation of the pushout square read

X --(i(X), f)--> I(X) ⊞ Y --> cone f,

so that the cone is the cokernel of (i(X), f).

That conflation is the point of the construction. Since I(X) is projective-injective, the biproduct inclusion Y ⟶ I(X) ⊞ Y becomes an isomorphism in the projective stable category and carries f to the inflation of the conflation. Thus every morphism of the underlying category is, up to a canonical isomorphism of its target in the stable category, the inflation of a conflation, and f acquires the standard sequence

X ⟶ Y ⟶ cone f ⟶ ΣX

whose last map is the connecting morphism of the cone conflation. This file constructs the cone together with that sequence, proves that consecutive composites vanish in the stable category, and makes the cone act on commutative squares.

The cone extends the construction it is modelled on. When f is already the inflation of a conflation X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z, the cone of f is an extension of Z by the projective-injective I(X), so it represents Z in the stable category.

Main definitions #

Main results #

References #

The cone of f : X ⟶ Y: the pushout of the chosen inflation X ⟶ I(X) along -f.

Equations
Instances For

    The map from the chosen injective object of X to the cone of f : X ⟶ Y.

    Equations
    Instances For

      The cone of f is the pushout of the chosen inflation X ⟶ I(X) along -f. This is the universal property of the cone.

      @[reducible, inline]

      The inflation (i(X), f) : X ⟶ I(X) ⊞ Y of the cone conflation of f.

      Equations
      Instances For
        @[reducible, inline]

        The deflation I(X) ⊞ Y ⟶ cone f of the cone conflation of f.

        Equations
        Instances For

          The cone conflation of f : X ⟶ Y: the cone is the cokernel of the inflation (i(X), f) : X ⟶ I(X) ⊞ Y.

          The connecting map cone f ⟶ ΣX of the cone of f : X ⟶ Y, induced by the chosen deflation I(X) ⟶ ΣX and the zero map on Y.

          Equations
          Instances For
            @[reducible, inline]

            The cone sequence Y ⟶ cone(f) ⟶ ΣX. It is the cobase change of the chosen suspension presentation of X along -f.

            Equations
            Instances For
              @[simp]

              The composite X ⟶ Y ⟶ cone f of the cone sequence vanishes in the projective stable category: it factors through the injective I(X).

              The map of cones induced by a commutative square f ≫ b = a ≫ f'.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For
                @[simp]

                Cone maps preserve identities in the projective stable category. The equality need not hold before passing to the stable category because the chosen maps between injective presentations need not preserve identities strictly.

                Cone maps preserve composition in the projective stable category. The equality need not hold before passing to the stable category because the chosen maps between injective presentations need not preserve composition strictly.

                This is not a simp lemma: the left-hand side mentions neither the intermediate morphism f' nor the two squares w and w', so simp could never instantiate them.

                @[simp]

                The cone map commutes with the connecting maps and the map induced by a on the cokernel terms of the chosen injective presentations.

                The comparison from the cone of the first map of a short complex X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z to its third term Z, induced by the zero map on I(X) and by the second map on Y.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  The third term of a kernel–cokernel pair is the cokernel of the injective object inside the cone of its first map.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    The cone of the inflation of a conflation differs from its third term by the chosen injective object: I(X) ⟶ cone S.f ⟶ Z is a conflation.

                    The cone of the inflation of a conflation represents its third term in the projective stable category, because it differs from it by a projective-injective summand.