Čech complexes along a functor into a thin category #
Let G : C ⥤ D be a functor between categories with finite products, where D is thin, for
instance a monotone map between posets of open subsets. For a family U : ι → C and a presheaf
Q : Dᵒᵖ ⥤ A, the Čech complex of the pulled-back presheaf G.op ⋙ Q for U has terms
Q(G(U (a 0) × ⋯ × U (a n))), while the Čech complex of Q for the family G ∘ U has terms
Q(G (U (a 0)) × ⋯ × G (U (a n))). There is always a map G(U (a 0) × ⋯ × U (a n)) ⟶ G (U (a 0)) × ⋯ × G (U (a n)); when there is also a map in the reverse direction
G (U (a 0)) × ⋯ × G (U (a n)) ⟶ G(U (a 0) × ⋯ × U (a n)), the two objects are isomorphic in the
thin category D, and the two Čech complexes are isomorphic (cechComplexCompIso). If moreover
G sends the terminal object T of C to a terminal object of D, this isomorphism is
compatible with the augmentations, so one augmented Čech complex is exact if and only if the other
is.
For open covers this compares the restriction of a cover to an open with a cover in a smaller
poset: for an open Y ⊆ W, the presheaf F(Y ∩ -) on the opens contained in W is pulled back
from the opens contained in Y along V ↦ Y ∩ V, which preserves intersections.
Main definitions #
TauCeti.CategoryTheory.cechComplexCompIso: the isomorphism between the Čech complex ofQforG ∘ Uand the Čech complex ofG.op ⋙ QforU.
Main results #
TauCeti.CategoryTheory.cechComplexFunctor_map_comp_cechComplexCompIso_hom: this isomorphism is natural in the presheaf.TauCeti.CategoryTheory.cechComplexMap_comp_cechComplexCompIso_hom: this isomorphism commutes with refinement maps, retaining their actual index functions.TauCeti.CategoryTheory.cechComplexMapHomotopy_hom_comp_cechComplexCompIso_hom: this isomorphism carries the homotopy between the maps induced by two refinement maps to the corresponding homotopy.TauCeti.CategoryTheory.cechAugmentation_comp_cechComplexCompIso_hom: this isomorphism is compatible with the augmentations.TauCeti.CategoryTheory.quasiIso_cechAugmentation_op_comp_iff: the augmented Čech complex ofG.op ⋙ QforUis exact if and only if the one ofQforG ∘ Uis.
The two Čech complexes are isomorphic #
The degree n term of a Čech complex is, up to unfolding, a product indexed by
a : Fin (n + 1) → ι (cechXIso); the differential is the alternating sum of the restrictions
along the coface maps (cechComplexFunctor_obj_d_comp_π). The isomorphism of Čech complexes
acts on the factor indexed by a through Q applied to the comparison isomorphism
G(U (a 0) × ⋯ × U (a n)) ≅ G (U (a 0)) × ⋯ × G (U (a n)) (prodIso); it commutes with the
differentials because all the morphisms of D with the same ends agree.
The Čech complex of Q for the family G ∘ U is isomorphic to the Čech complex of G.op ⋙ Q
for U, provided each product G (U (a 0)) × ⋯ × G (U (a n)) maps to G(U (a 0) × ⋯ × U (a n)).
In degree n it acts on the factor indexed by a through Q applied to the canonical map
G(U (a 0) × ⋯ × U (a n)) ⟶ G (U (a 0)) × ⋯ × G (U (a n)) (cechComplexCompIso_hom_f_π).
Instances For
The factor of (cechComplexCompIso G U Q hG).hom.f n indexed by a is Q applied to the
canonical map G(U (a 0) × ⋯ × U (a n)) ⟶ G (U (a 0)) × ⋯ × G (U (a n)).
The factor of (cechComplexCompIso G U Q hG).hom.f n indexed by a is Q applied to the
canonical map G(U (a 0) × ⋯ × U (a n)) ⟶ G (U (a 0)) × ⋯ × G (U (a n)).
The isomorphism of Čech complexes cechComplexCompIso is natural in the presheaf Q.
The isomorphism of Čech complexes cechComplexCompIso is natural in the presheaf Q.
The comparison along G commutes with actual refinement functions, including ones that
repeat or identify indices.
The comparison along G commutes with actual refinement functions, including ones that
repeat or identify indices.
The comparison along G carries the homotopy between the maps induced by two refinement maps
φ and ψ (cechComplexMapHomotopy) for Q and the family G ∘ U to the corresponding
homotopy for G.op ⋙ Q and the family U.
The comparison along G carries the homotopy between the maps induced by two refinement maps
φ and ψ (cechComplexMapHomotopy) for Q and the family G ∘ U to the corresponding
homotopy for G.op ⋙ Q and the family U.
If G sends the terminal object T of C to a terminal object, the isomorphism of Čech
complexes cechComplexCompIso is compatible with the augmentations.
If G sends the terminal object T of C to a terminal object, the isomorphism of Čech
complexes cechComplexCompIso is compatible with the augmentations.
Čech complexes along a functor into a thin category. Let G : C ⥤ D be a functor between
categories with finite products, with D thin, let U be a family in C and let Q be a
presheaf on D with values in an abelian category. Suppose that G sends the terminal object T
of C to a terminal object, and that each product G (U (a 0)) × ⋯ × G (U (a n)) maps to
G(U (a 0) × ⋯ × U (a n)). Then the augmented Čech complex of G.op ⋙ Q for U is exact if and
only if the augmented Čech complex of Q for the family G ∘ U is.