The prime powers that decide whether a divisor fits beside a fixed factor #
Let f and d both divide h. Whether the product f * d still divides h is decided one
prime at a time, and only at the primes of f: room for f * d fails at p exactly when d
carries p to a power that exceeds the room h leaves after f, which is v_p h - v_p f. So
f * d ∣ h holds exactly when no prime p of f divides d to the exponent
v_p h - v_p f + 1.
The one-sided reading is what makes the statement useful: the primes outside f impose no
condition, because d ∣ h already leaves them enough room.
The exponents v_p h - v_p f + 1 are themselves exponents of prime powers dividing h, both
one prime at a time and all at once, since the primes of f are distinct.
Main results #
Nat.mul_dvd_iff_forall_not_pow_dvd:f * d ∣ has non-divisibility ofdby a prime power at each prime off.Nat.pow_factorization_sub_factorization_add_one_dvd: the tested prime power dividesh.Nat.prod_pow_factorization_sub_factorization_add_one_dvd: so does their product over the primes off.
A divisor fits beside a fixed factor exactly away from prime powers. For f and d
dividing a nonzero h, the product f * d divides h if and only if no prime p of f
divides d to the exponent v_p h - v_p f + 1.
Only the primes of f are tested: at a prime p not dividing f the hypothesis d ∣ h
already gives v_p d ≤ v_p h.
The prime power tested by mul_dvd_iff_forall_not_pow_dvd divides h. For f
dividing h and p a prime of f, the exponent v_p h - v_p f + 1 does not exceed v_p h,
because f contributes at least one power of p.
The product of the prime powers tested by mul_dvd_iff_forall_not_pow_dvd divides h.
The primes of f are distinct, so the prime powers p ^ (v_p h - v_p f + 1) occur at distinct
primes and their product still divides h: it is the product of prime powers read off a finitely
supported exponent function bounded by the factorization of h.