The first Stiefel–Whitney class of a transferred line #
Let L/K be a finite extension of fields in which 2 is invertible, s : L → K a nonzero
K-linear functional, and a ∈ Lˣ with Kummer class x = (a) ∈ H¹(G_L, 𝔽₂). The first
Stiefel–Whitney class of the Scharlau transfer of the line ⟨a⟩ is
w₁(s_*⟨a⟩) = w₁(s_*⟨1⟩) + cor(x),
where cor : H¹(G_L, 𝔽₂) → H¹(G_K, 𝔽₂) is corestriction along any K-embedding of L into a
separable closure of K. For the trace of a finite separable extension this is the degree-one
part of Kahn's relative Stiefel–Whitney formula for Tr_*⟨a⟩.
Since w₁ is the Kummer class of the discriminant, the formula is the discriminant identity
d(s_*⟨a⟩) = d(s_*⟨1⟩) · N_{L/K}(a) (TauCeti.discr_formClass_scharlauTransfer_smul_sq) read
through the Kummer isomorphism, together with the law cor (a) = (N_{L/K} a)
(TauCeti.galoisCor_kummerClass).
Main results #
TauCeti.sw1Class_scharlauTransfer_mk_rankOne:w₁(s_*⟨a⟩) = w₁(s_*⟨1⟩) + cor (a)for the class-level transfer along a nonzero functional.TauCeti.sw1Class_traceTransfer_mk_rankOne:w₁(Tr_*⟨a⟩) = w₁(Tr_*⟨1⟩) + cor (a)for a finite separable extension.TauCeti.sw1Class_formClass_scharlauTransfer_smul_sqandTauCeti.sw1Class_formClass_traceTransfer_smul_sq: the same identity for the transferred formsx ↦ s(a x²)andx ↦ s(x²)onLthemselves, in particular for the twisted trace forms.TauCeti.sw1_eq_add_galoisCor_of_equivalent_scharlauTransferandTauCeti.sw1_eq_add_galoisCor_of_equivalent_traceTransfer: the identity read on diagonal presentations: ifs_*⟨1⟩ ≅ ⟨t₁, …, tₘ⟩ands_*⟨a⟩ ≅ ⟨b₁, …, bₙ⟩, then∑ⱼ (bⱼ) = ∑ᵢ (tᵢ) + cor (a). This is the form in which the formula is applied to an explicit diagonalization of the two transferred forms over a fixed base field.
References #
- B. Kahn, Classes de Stiefel-Whitney de formes quadratiques et de représentations galoisiennes réelles, Invent. Math. 78 (1984), 223–256, Théorème 2.
The first Stiefel–Whitney class of a transferred line: for a nonzero functional
s : L → K and a ∈ Lˣ, w₁(s_*⟨a⟩) = w₁(s_*⟨1⟩) + cor (a), with corestriction taken along
any K-embedding σ of L into a separable closure of K.
The first Stiefel–Whitney class of a transferred line, on the forms themselves: for a
K-linear functional s : L → K and a ∈ Lˣ, the first Stiefel–Whitney classes of the regular
forms x ↦ s(a x²) and x ↦ s(x²) on L differ by cor (a). Regularity of the two forms is a
hypothesis.
The relative Stiefel–Whitney formula in degree one, on the trace forms themselves: for a
finite extension L/K and a ∈ Lˣ, the first Stiefel–Whitney classes of the regular
forms x ↦ Tr_{L/K}(a x²) and x ↦ Tr_{L/K}(x²) on L differ by cor (a). Regularity of the
two forms is a hypothesis; it forces L/K to be separable.
The relative Stiefel–Whitney formula in degree one, on diagonal presentations: for a
K-linear functional s : L → K and a ∈ Lˣ, if the transferred forms x ↦ s(x²) and
x ↦ s(a x²) on L are isometric to ⟨t₁, …, tₘ⟩ and ⟨b₁, …, bₙ⟩, then
∑ⱼ (bⱼ) = ∑ᵢ (tᵢ) + cor (a). No regularity hypothesis is needed: isometry with a diagonal form
with unit coefficients already makes both transferred forms regular.
The relative Stiefel–Whitney formula in degree one, on diagonal presentations of the trace
forms: for a finite extension L/K and a ∈ Lˣ, if Tr_*⟨1⟩ ≅ ⟨t₁, …, tₘ⟩ and
Tr_*⟨a⟩ ≅ ⟨b₁, …, bₙ⟩, then ∑ⱼ (bⱼ) = ∑ᵢ (tᵢ) + cor (a).
The relative Stiefel–Whitney formula in degree one: for a finite separable extension
L/K and a ∈ Lˣ, w₁(Tr_*⟨a⟩) = w₁(Tr_*⟨1⟩) + cor (a), with corestriction taken along any
K-embedding σ of L into a separable closure of K.