Documentation

TauCeti.FieldTheory.QuadraticForm.StiefelWhitney.Transfer

The first Stiefel–Whitney class of a transferred line #

Let L/K be a finite extension of fields in which 2 is invertible, s : L → K a nonzero K-linear functional, and a ∈ Lˣ with Kummer class x = (a) ∈ H¹(G_L, 𝔽₂). The first Stiefel–Whitney class of the Scharlau transfer of the line ⟨a⟩ is

w₁(s_*⟨a⟩) = w₁(s_*⟨1⟩) + cor(x),

where cor : H¹(G_L, 𝔽₂) → H¹(G_K, 𝔽₂) is corestriction along any K-embedding of L into a separable closure of K. For the trace of a finite separable extension this is the degree-one part of Kahn's relative Stiefel–Whitney formula for Tr_*⟨a⟩.

Since w₁ is the Kummer class of the discriminant, the formula is the discriminant identity d(s_*⟨a⟩) = d(s_*⟨1⟩) · N_{L/K}(a) (TauCeti.discr_formClass_scharlauTransfer_smul_sq) read through the Kummer isomorphism, together with the law cor (a) = (N_{L/K} a) (TauCeti.galoisCor_kummerClass).

Main results #

References #

The first Stiefel–Whitney class of a transferred line: for a nonzero functional s : L → K and a ∈ Lˣ, w₁(s_*⟨a⟩) = w₁(s_*⟨1⟩) + cor (a), with corestriction taken along any K-embedding σ of L into a separable closure of K.

The first Stiefel–Whitney class of a transferred line, on the forms themselves: for a K-linear functional s : L → K and a ∈ Lˣ, the first Stiefel–Whitney classes of the regular forms x ↦ s(a x²) and x ↦ s(x²) on L differ by cor (a). Regularity of the two forms is a hypothesis.

The relative Stiefel–Whitney formula in degree one, on the trace forms themselves: for a finite extension L/K and a ∈ Lˣ, the first Stiefel–Whitney classes of the regular forms x ↦ Tr_{L/K}(a x²) and x ↦ Tr_{L/K}(x²) on L differ by cor (a). Regularity of the two forms is a hypothesis; it forces L/K to be separable.

The relative Stiefel–Whitney formula in degree one, on diagonal presentations: for a K-linear functional s : L → K and a ∈ Lˣ, if the transferred forms x ↦ s(x²) and x ↦ s(a x²) on L are isometric to ⟨t₁, …, tₘ⟩ and ⟨b₁, …, bₙ⟩, then ∑ⱼ (bⱼ) = ∑ᵢ (tᵢ) + cor (a). No regularity hypothesis is needed: isometry with a diagonal form with unit coefficients already makes both transferred forms regular.

The relative Stiefel–Whitney formula in degree one, on diagonal presentations of the trace forms: for a finite extension L/K and a ∈ Lˣ, if Tr_*⟨1⟩ ≅ ⟨t₁, …, tₘ⟩ and Tr_*⟨a⟩ ≅ ⟨b₁, …, bₙ⟩, then ∑ⱼ (bⱼ) = ∑ᵢ (tᵢ) + cor (a).

The relative Stiefel–Whitney formula in degree one: for a finite separable extension L/K and a ∈ Lˣ, w₁(Tr_*⟨a⟩) = w₁(Tr_*⟨1⟩) + cor (a), with corestriction taken along any K-embedding σ of L into a separable closure of K.