Documentation

TauCeti.Geometry.Manifold.Foliation.EulerClass

The Euler class of a foliation and Thurston's Euler class one conjecture #

The tangent field of a foliation F of rank k of a real manifold M is a real vector bundle of rank k (TauCeti.IsContMDiffDistribution.vectorBundle). An orientation of it is a Thom class u ∈ Hᵏ(TF, TF₀) (TauCeti.Foliation.IsThomClass), and its Euler class is the class e(u) ∈ Hᵏ(M) of TauCeti.eulerClass (TauCeti.Foliation.eulerClass). A class e ∈ Hᵏ(M) is an Euler class of F (TauCeti.Foliation.IsEulerClass) when it is e(u) for some orientation u of the tangent field. Reversing the orientation negates the Euler class, and a tangent field with a nowhere-vanishing continuous section has Euler class zero.

For a codimension-one foliation of a closed 3-manifold the tangent field is a plane field, with an Euler class in H²(M; ℤ), and evaluating it on embedded surfaces bounds the topology of the leaves. A class e ∈ H²(X; ℤ) satisfies the Euler class inequality (TauCeti.EulerClassBounded) when |⟨e, f_*[S]⟩| ≤ -χ(S) for every closed connected oriented surface S with χ(S) ≤ 0 and every embedding f : S → X; here ⟨e, f_*[S]⟩ is the evaluation TauCeti.HomologicalOrientation.evalFundamentalClass of e on the image of the fundamental class. The inequality is sharp for e (TauCeti.EulerClassNormOne) when moreover equality holds on some such surface with χ(S) < 0. On a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold these two conditions say that e has dual Thurston norm at most one, respectively exactly one: the Thurston norm of a class is the least -χ of an embedded surface without sphere components representing it, and by Gabai it is also the least -χ of a singular surface representing it, so merely topological embeddings may be allowed. That equivalence is not formalized here; the two predicates are the surface conditions themselves.

Thurston proved that the Euler class of a taut foliation of a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold satisfies the Euler class inequality (TauCeti.ThurstonEulerClassInequality), and conjectured conversely that every even integral class for which the inequality is sharp is the Euler class of a taut foliation (TauCeti.EulerClassOneConjecture). Evenness is necessary: the Euler class of an oriented plane field ξ on a closed orientable 3-manifold reduces mod 2 to w₂(ξ) = w₂(M) = 0, so it is divisible by 2. Yazdi found even counterexamples (TauCeti.YazdiEulerClassOneTheorem), refuting the conjecture (TauCeti.YazdiEulerClassOneTheorem.not_eulerClassOneConjecture). These statements are recorded, not proved; foliations in them are smooth, so the counterexample statement is the weakest form of Yazdi's theorem.

Main definitions #

Main results #

References #

@[reducible, inline]
noncomputable abbrev TauCeti.Foliation.thomPair {E : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {H : Type u_1} [TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E H} {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {M : Type w} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] {k : ℕ} [IsManifold I (n + 1) M] (F : Foliation I n M k) :

The Thom pair (TF, TF₀) of the tangent field TF of a foliation: the total space of the tangent field, as a subspace of the tangent bundle, relative to its nonzero vectors.

Instances For

    An orientation of the tangent field of a foliation of rank k, recorded as a Thom class u ∈ Hᵏ(TF, TF₀) (TauCeti.IsThomClass): a relative class restricting to a generator of the cohomology of every fibre pair.

    Instances For

      The Euler class Hᵏ(TF, TF₀) ⟶ Hᵏ(M) of the tangent field of a foliation of rank k: TauCeti.eulerClass, restriction to the total space followed by pullback along the zero section, read in degree k.

      Instances For

        A class e ∈ Hᵏ(M) is an Euler class of the foliation F of rank k when it is the Euler class of some orientation of the tangent field of F.

        Instances For
          theorem TauCeti.Foliation.isThomClass_iff {E : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {H : Type u_1} [TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E H} {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {M : Type w} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] {k : ℕ} [IsManifold I (n + 1) M] (F : Foliation I n M k) {C : Type u} [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasCoproducts C] [CategoryTheory.Abelian C] {R : C} {K : Type u_2} [Ring K] [CategoryTheory.Linear K C] {N : C} {u : ↑(F.thomPair.singularCohomology R K N (Module.finrank ℝ (Fin k → ℝ)))} :
          F.IsThomClass u ↔ TauCeti.IsThomClass (Fin k → ℝ) (fun (x : M) => ↥(F.distribution x)) u

          The defining property of an orientation of the tangent field.

          The Euler class of a foliation is that of its tangent field, read in degree k.

          The defining property of an Euler class of a foliation.

          The Euler class of an orientation of the tangent field is an Euler class of the foliation.

          The negative of a Thom class of the tangent field is a Thom class: the reversed orientation.

          Reversing the orientation of the tangent field negates its Euler class.

          theorem TauCeti.Foliation.eulerClass_eq_zero_of_forall_ne_zero {E : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {H : Type u_1} [TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E H} {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {M : Type w} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] {k : ℕ} [IsManifold I (n + 1) M] (F : Foliation I n M k) {C : Type u} [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasCoproducts C] [CategoryTheory.Abelian C] (R : C) (K : Type u_2) [Ring K] [CategoryTheory.Linear K C] (N : C) [IsManifold I 1 M] {s : (x : M) → ↥(F.distribution x)} (hs : Continuous fun (x : M) => ⟨x, ↑(s x)⟩) (hs₀ : ∀ (x : M), s x ≠ 0) :
          F.eulerClass R K N = 0

          A nowhere-vanishing tangent vector field kills the Euler class. If the tangent field of F has a section s that is continuous as a vector field on M and vanishes nowhere, then the Euler class map of F is zero, so 0 is the only possible Euler class of F. The instance IsManifold I 1 M, implied by the C^(n + 1) structure, gives the tangent bundle its topology.

          theorem TauCeti.Foliation.IsEulerClass.eq_zero_of_forall_ne_zero {E : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {H : Type u_1} [TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E H} {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {M : Type w} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] {k : ℕ} [IsManifold I (n + 1) M] {F : Foliation I n M k} {C : Type u} [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasCoproducts C] [CategoryTheory.Abelian C] {R : C} {K : Type u_2} [Ring K] [CategoryTheory.Linear K C] {N : C} [IsManifold I 1 M] {e : ↑(TopCat.singularCohomology R K N (↧M) k)} (he : F.IsEulerClass e) {s : (x : M) → ↥(F.distribution x)} (hs : Continuous fun (x : M) => ⟨x, ↑(s x)⟩) (hs₀ : ∀ (x : M), s x ≠ 0) :
          e = 0

          If the tangent field of F has a continuous nowhere-vanishing section, then every Euler class of F is zero.

          The Euler class inequality #

          The Euler class inequality for an integral class e ∈ H²(X; ℤ): for every closed connected oriented surface S of Euler characteristic χ(S) ≤ 0 and every embedding f : S → X, the evaluation of e on f_*[S] satisfies |⟨e, f_*[S]⟩| ≤ -χ(S). Closed surfaces have finite CW type, which makes χ(S) defined. On a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold this says that e has dual Thurston norm at most one.

          Instances For

            The Euler class inequality is sharp for an integral class e ∈ H²(X; ℤ) when e satisfies it and some closed connected oriented surface S with χ(S) < 0 embeds in X by an f with |⟨e, f_*[S]⟩| = -χ(S). On a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold this says that e has dual Thurston norm exactly one.

            Instances For

              A class satisfying the Euler class inequality obeys the bound |⟨e, f_*[S]⟩| ≤ -χ(S) on every embedded closed connected oriented surface S with χ(S) ≤ 0.

              The zero class satisfies the Euler class inequality.

              @[simp]

              A class satisfies the Euler class inequality exactly when its negative does.

              Alias of the reverse direction of TauCeti.eulerClassBounded_neg_iff.


              A class satisfies the Euler class inequality exactly when its negative does.

              A class satisfying the Euler class inequality vanishes on every embedded closed connected oriented surface of Euler characteristic zero, such as an embedded torus.

              A class satisfying the Euler class inequality is sharp for it once some embedded closed connected oriented surface S with χ(S) < 0 has |⟨e, f_*[S]⟩| = -χ(S).

              A class for which the Euler class inequality is sharp satisfies it.

              A class for which the Euler class inequality is sharp has a sharpness witness: an embedded closed connected oriented surface S with χ(S) < 0 and |⟨e, f_*[S]⟩| = -χ(S).

              @[simp]

              The Euler class inequality is sharp for a class exactly when it is sharp for its negative.

              Alias of the reverse direction of TauCeti.eulerClassNormOne_neg_iff.


              The Euler class inequality is sharp for a class exactly when it is sharp for its negative.

              The Euler class inequality is never sharp for the zero class.

              Thurston's Euler class one conjecture #

              Thurston's Euler class inequality: on a closed orientable hyperbolic 3-manifold M, that is a compact connected orientable smooth 3-manifold without boundary admitting a complete Riemannian metric of constant curvature -1, every Euler class of a smooth taut codimension-one foliation satisfies the Euler class inequality.

              Instances For

                Thurston's Euler class one conjecture: on a closed orientable hyperbolic 3-manifold M, every even integral class e ∈ H²(M; ℤ) for which the Euler class inequality is sharp is an Euler class of a smooth taut codimension-one foliation of M. Evenness is necessary, since the Euler class of an oriented plane field on M reduces mod 2 to w₂(M) = 0.

                The conjecture is false, by Yazdi (TauCeti.YazdiEulerClassOneTheorem.not_eulerClassOneConjecture).

                Instances For

                  Under Thurston's Euler class inequality, every Euler class of a smooth taut codimension-one foliation of a closed orientable hyperbolic 3-manifold satisfies the Euler class inequality.

                  Under the Euler class one conjecture, every even integral class of a closed orientable hyperbolic 3-manifold for which the Euler class inequality is sharp is an Euler class of a smooth taut codimension-one foliation.

                  Yazdi's theorem: some closed orientable hyperbolic 3-manifold M carries an even integral class e ∈ H²(M; ℤ) for which the Euler class inequality is sharp, but which is not an Euler class of any smooth taut codimension-one foliation of M.

                  Instances For