Locally flat embeddings #
Topological manifolds admit embeddings that no smooth embedding can imitate: the Alexander horned
sphere is a topologically embedded 2-sphere in S³ bounding a non-simply-connected region, and a
wild arc in ℝ³ is knotted although its domain is an interval. Theorems about topological
manifolds therefore quantify over locally flat embeddings, those that in suitable ambient charts
look like the standard coordinate slice.
This file introduces that notion and the structural API it is used through. The definition is built in three layers.
TauCeti.IsSliceChart φ S Asays that a single chartφof the ambient space flattens the setAonto the model sliceS, in the sense thatφ '' (φ.source ∩ A) = φ.target ∩ S.TauCeti.IsSliceEmbedding S fsays thatfis a topological embedding admitting a slice chart forSet.range faround every point of its image. HereSis an arbitrary subset of an arbitrary model space, so this is not local flatness; it is the transport layer on which the closure properties are proved, and it is stated relatively so that they can be.TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat F F' fis local flatness proper: it isIsSliceEmbeddingfor the standard coordinate sliceF × {0}of the model spaceF × F', so ambient charts take values inF × F'and carry the image offexactly onto the vanishing locus of the lastF'coordinates. WithF = ℝⁿandF' = ℝᵏthis is the textbookℝⁿ × {0} ⊆ ℝⁿ⁺ᵏ.
Codimension is not baked in: it is the choice of the complementary model F', so codimension 0
(F' a subsingleton, where local flatness is openness of the embedding), codimension 1 (where
collaring lives) and codimension 2 (where knotting lives) are all instances of the one predicate,
which is the point.
Local flatness is a local condition, so the load-bearing content is not the definition but its closure properties: restriction to an open subset of the domain, locality, invariance under homeomorphisms and open embeddings on either side, invariance under a change of model space, and products. Those are proved here, together with two results that pin the notion down: in codimension zero local flatness is exactly openness of the embedding, and a locally flat embedding has locally closed image as soon as the origin of the complementary model is closed (on the relative layer, as soon as the model slice is locally closed).
This is layer 2 of the geometric-topology roadmap, the substrate for topologically locally flat discs (topological sliceness) and for stating the annulus conjecture.
Main definitions #
TauCeti.IsSliceChart: an ambient chart flattening a set onto a model slice.TauCeti.IsSliceChart.subtypeChart: the chart on a flattened set induced by a zero-slice chart, with values in the tangential model.TauCeti.IsSliceEmbedding: an embedding flattened onto a given model slice by ambient charts.TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat: a locally flat embedding, the case of the standard coordinate slice.
Main results #
TauCeti.isSliceChart_iff: a chart is a slice chart iff, on its source, membership in the set is read off as membership of the coordinates in the slice.TauCeti.IsSliceChart.exists_target_eq: a slice chart can be shrunk to have any prescribed open subset of its target as its target.TauCeti.isLocallyFlat_iff_isSliceEmbedding,TauCeti.isLocallyFlat_iffandTauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.exists_isSliceChart: the defining flattening charts, as the slice embedding for the standard slice, in pointwise form, and as an eliminator.TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.restrictandTauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.of_forall_exists_isOpen: local flatness is a local property of the domain.TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.isOpenEmbedding_comp,TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.of_isOpenEmbedding_comp,TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.codRestrict,TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.homeomorph_comp,TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.comp_isOpenEmbedding,TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.comp_homeomorph: invariance under open embeddings and homeomorphisms of the ambient space and of the domain.TauCeti.IsSliceEmbedding.transHomeomorph: invariance under a homeomorphic change of model space, andTauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.transHomeomorph, its form for the complementary model of a locally flat embedding.TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.comp: a composite of locally flat embeddings is locally flat, under an explicit hypothesis that their flattening charts can be chosen compatibly, andTauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.of_compatible_isSliceChart, the form of it that assumes only the compatible pair of charts.TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.prodMap: a product of locally flat embeddings is locally flat.TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.prodMap_of_isOpenEmbedding: the product of a locally flat embedding with an open embedding is locally flat, with the same complementary model.TauCeti.isLocallyFlat_iff_isOpenEmbedding: in codimension zero, locally flat means open.TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.isLocallyClosed_range: a locally flat image is locally closed, as soon as the origin of the complementary model is closed.TauCeti.isLocallyFlat_prodMkLeft: over a domain charted onF, the standard modelx ↦ (x, 0)is locally flat.TauCeti.isLocallyFlat_graph: the graph of a continuous map is locally flat.TauCeti.exists_isSliceChart_of_inter_eq_inter_range: a set which, near a point, is the graph of a continuous map over the first coordinate of a homeomorphismM ≃ₜ F × F'is flattened by a chart around that point.TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.exists_isOpenEmbedding_prod: a locally flat embedding with seminormed complementary model has local product neighbourhoods.
Implementation notes #
The relative predicate IsSliceEmbedding is deliberately not the definition of local flatness,
and is not a substitute for it: its slice is an arbitrary subset of an arbitrary space, so taking
the model space to be M itself, the slice to be Set.range f and the chart to be
OpenPartialHomeomorph.refl M makes every embedding, wild ones included, a slice embedding. It is
the layer on which transport is proved, because the closure properties genuinely need a slice that
varies (a product of standard slices is a standard slice only after a permutation of coordinates,
which is where IsSliceEmbedding.transHomeomorph is used). Local flatness is
IsLocallyFlat F F' f, which fixes the slice to be the standard one, and that predicate does have
teeth: TauCeti.isLocallyFlat_iff_isOpenEmbedding shows that in codimension zero it is equivalent
to openness of the embedding, and TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.isLocallyClosed_range rules out an image
that is not locally closed, which the horned sphere's complement-side wildness aside is already
enough to exclude embeddings no chart can flatten.
No membership in a prescribed atlas is required of the flattening chart: an
OpenPartialHomeomorph M (F × F') is automatically a chart of the maximal topological atlas of a
topological manifold M modelled on F × F', so demanding atlas membership would be redundant
there and would needlessly restrict the definition on ambient spaces that are not manifolds. The
model-space data enters exactly as it does for ChartedSpace, through the codomain of the charts.
A slice chart is only asked to flatten the set relative to its own target, that is
φ '' (φ.source ∩ A) = φ.target ∩ S rather than φ.target = F together with
φ '' (φ.source ∩ A) = S. The relative form is the one that is genuinely local, hence the one
closed under restriction; the textbook form is not, since shrinking the source shrinks the target.
For the standard model, a chart in the relative sense can be shrunk to a ball around the point and
rescaled onto (ℝᵐ, ℝⁿ), recovering the textbook form, but that comparison needs the linear
structure and is not formalised here.
Composing two locally flat embeddings N ↪ M ↪ P is not a formal consequence of the definition:
the chart of M flattening the inner embedding and the chart of P flattening the outer one are
chosen independently, and nothing makes them agree. TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.comp therefore carries
that agreement as an explicit hypothesis on charts witnessing the local flatness of the two
factors — the outer chart reads the intermediate coordinates off the inner one along g — rather
than assuming the conclusion; the outer chart then flattens the composite, and the complementary
models multiply. Composition comes in two levels, because a witnessing chart can only be referred
to by exhibiting it, so the compatibility hypothesis necessarily re-exhibits the two charts and
thereby already carries the flattening content of the two factors. TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.comp is
the statement in the shape it is used and read, with both factors locally flat;
TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.of_compatible_isSliceChart is what its proof actually consumes, a
compatible pair of charts around each point together with the embedding content of the conclusion
itself, and comp is a two-line consequence of it. There the compatibility hypothesis is kept down
to the part not already implied by the rest of it: the outer chart is only asked to detect
range g in one direction, the other direction and the fact that the inner chart is a chart around
f x both following from the agreement of the two charts together with injectivity of the outer
map. Both are stated only for the standard slice, since the compatibility condition refers to the
splitting F × F' of the intermediate model, which the relative layer does not have. The ambient
codimension-zero case needs no such hypothesis and is kept separate, as
TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.isOpenEmbedding_comp and its converse.
References #
- R. Daverman and G. Venema, Embeddings in Manifolds, AMS Graduate Studies in Mathematics 106 (2009), Chapter 1, for local flatness and wild embeddings.
- M. Brown, Locally flat imbeddings of topological manifolds, Annals of Mathematics 75 (1962), 331–341, for the collaring theorem that local flatness was isolated to prove.
IsSliceChart φ S A says that the ambient chart φ flattens the set A onto the model slice
S: the chart carries the part of A it sees exactly onto the part of S in its target.
Instances For
A chart is a slice chart for A exactly when, on its source, membership in A can be read off
as membership of the coordinates in the slice. This pointwise form is how the predicate is used.
On the source of a slice chart, membership in the flattened set is membership of the
coordinates in the model slice. This is the pointwise form of TauCeti.isSliceChart_iff in the
shape proofs use it, as an elimination rule at a single point.
The ambient inverse of a point on the zero slice belongs to the set flattened by a zero-slice chart.
On the flattened set, a zero-slice chart is recovered by reinserting the zero transverse coordinate after taking the first projection.
Restrict an ambient zero-slice chart to the flattened set and retain its tangential coordinate.
Equations
- h.subtypeChart = e.subtypeCoord s ⋯ (fun (y : Y) => (y, 0)) Prod.fst ⋯ ⋯ ⋯ ⋯ ⋯
Instances For
The source of a zero-slice subtype chart is the part of the subtype in the ambient source.
The target of a zero-slice subtype chart consists of the tangential coordinates whose zero-slice points lie in the ambient target.
A zero-slice subtype chart reads the first coordinate of the ambient chart.
On its source, a subtype chart recovers the ambient coordinates by reinserting the zero transverse coordinate.
On its target, the inverse of a zero-slice subtype chart is the ambient inverse evaluated on the zero slice.
On the source of a slice chart, the flattened set is cut out by the slice.
A slice chart can be shrunk so that its target becomes a prescribed open subset of the old target, without changing the map.
Restricting a slice chart to an open set restricts the flattened set to the same open set.
Conversely, a chart flattening A ∩ V for an open V restricts to a chart flattening A.
Slice charts pull back along any chart of a second ambient space. This is the single transport lemma behind invariance under open embeddings and homeomorphisms.
Composing a slice chart with a homeomorphism of the model space transports the slice.
The product of two slice charts is a slice chart for the product slice.
A chart is a slice chart for the full model space exactly when everything it sees lies in the set: this is the codimension-zero case.
A topological embedding f : N → M is a slice embedding for the model slice S ⊆ F if
around every point of its image there is a chart of M with values in the model space F carrying
the image of f onto S.
This is a relative notion: S is arbitrary, so it is not local flatness, which is the case of the
standard slice, TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat. It is the layer the transport lemmas are proved on, since
they move the slice around.
- isEmbedding : Topology.IsEmbedding f
A slice embedding is in particular a topological embedding.
- exists_isSliceChart (x : N) : ∃ (φ : OpenPartialHomeomorph M F), f x ∈ φ.source ∧ IsSliceChart φ S (Set.range f)
Around every point of the image there is a chart flattening the image onto the slice.
Instances For
A topological embedding f : N → M is locally flat with model F × F' if around every point
of its image there is a chart of M with values in F × F' carrying the image of f onto the
standard coordinate slice F × {0}.
For M a topological manifold modelled on F × F' and N one modelled on F this is the usual
condition that f looks like ℝⁿ × {0} ⊆ ℝⁿ⁺ᵏ in ambient charts; the codimension is the choice of
the complementary model F', and is not otherwise constrained.
Equations
- TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat F F' f = TauCeti.IsSliceEmbedding (Set.univ ×ˢ {0}) f
Instances For
Being a slice embedding is inherited by the restriction to an open subset of the domain.
Being a slice embedding is a local property of the domain: if every point of N has an open
neighbourhood on which the restriction of f is a slice embedding, then f is one.
Being a slice embedding is invariant under precomposition with a homeomorphism of the domain.
Being a slice embedding is invariant under precomposition with an open embedding of the domain: such a precomposition is a restriction to an open subset, read through the homeomorphism onto its range.
Pushing a slice embedding forward along an open embedding of the ambient space keeps it a slice
embedding. Taking g the inclusion of an open subset, this is the statement that a slice embedding
into an open subset is one into the whole space.
Conversely, an embedding that becomes a slice embedding after an open embedding of the ambient
space was already one. Taking g the inclusion of an open subset, this corestricts a slice
embedding to an open neighbourhood of its image.
Corestriction: a slice embedding whose image lies in an open subset V of the ambient space is
a slice embedding as a map into V.
Being a slice embedding is invariant under a homeomorphism of the ambient space.
Being a slice embedding only depends on the model space up to homeomorphism, the slice being transported along.
A product of slice embeddings is a slice embedding for the product slice: a product of slice charts is a slice chart.
A slice embedding for the full model space is an open embedding.
The image of a slice embedding is locally closed as soon as the model slice is. This is where the definition has teeth: the image of a wild embedding need not be locally closed in any chart in this way.
An open embedding into a space charted on F is a slice embedding for the full model space.
Codimension zero: a map into a space charted on F is a slice embedding for the whole model
space exactly when it is an open embedding.
The defining charts of a locally flat embedding: around every point of the image there is a
chart of the ambient space, with values in F × F', carrying the image onto the standard
coordinate slice. This is the eliminator consumers use to get hold of a flattening chart.
Local flatness is inherited by the restriction to an open subset of the domain.
Local flatness is a local property of the domain: if every point of N has an open
neighbourhood on which the restriction of f is locally flat, then f is locally flat.
Local flatness is invariant under precomposition with a homeomorphism of the domain.
Local flatness is invariant under precomposition with an open embedding of the domain.
Pushing a locally flat embedding forward along an open embedding of the ambient space keeps it
locally flat. Taking g the inclusion of an open subset, this is the statement that a locally flat
embedding into an open subset is locally flat into the whole space.
Conversely, an embedding that becomes locally flat after an open embedding of the ambient space was already locally flat.
Corestriction: a locally flat embedding whose image lies in an open subset V of the ambient
space is locally flat as a map into V.
Local flatness is invariant under a homeomorphism of the ambient space.
Local flatness only depends on the complementary model up to a homeomorphism fixing the origin.
The general form of TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.comp: what makes a composite locally flat is a
compatible pair of charts around each point of the domain, and nothing else. It asks for a chart
ψ of P at g (f x) and a flattening chart φ of M for f such that ψ reads the
intermediate coordinates off φ along g, in the sense ψ (g y) = (φ y, 0) on the source of φ,
such that ψ sees no more of range g than φ charts, and such that on its source ψ detects
range g from the vanishing of the outer coordinate. That same ψ then flattens g ∘ f, whose
complementary model is the product of the two complementary models. Since hcompat already
supplies every flattening chart the conclusion needs, the only embedding content assumed is what
the conclusion itself carries, that g ∘ f is an embedding, together with injectivity of g. Only
the stated half of the flattening of range g by ψ is assumed, the other half being forced by
hagree and hsub; likewise f x ∈ φ.source is not assumed, since hsub and injectivity of g
already give it.
Composition of locally flat embeddings, under an explicit compatibility hypothesis on
their flattening charts. Local flatness of f : N → M and of g : M → P does not by itself make
g ∘ f locally flat, because the chart of M flattening f and the chart of P flattening g
are chosen independently and nothing makes them agree; hcompat is the hypothesis that charts
witnessing hf and hg can be chosen coherently around each point of the domain, namely so that
the outer chart reads the intermediate coordinates off the inner one along g, in the sense
ψ (g y) = (φ y, 0) on the source of φ, and sees no more of range g than the inner one charts.
The outer chart then flattens the composite, whose complementary model is the product of the two
complementary models.
Only the compatible pair of charts is used, not the two local flatness hypotheses in full; that
sharper form is TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat.of_compatible_isSliceChart, from which this is derived.
A product of locally flat embeddings is locally flat, the models multiplying: the product of two standard slices is the standard slice of the product, after the permutation of coordinates exchanging the two middle factors.
The product of a locally flat embedding with an open embedding into a space charted on G is
locally flat, with the same complementary model: the product of a flattening chart with a chart of
the open image is a flattening chart, once the new factor is moved into the tangential model.
The image of a locally flat embedding is locally closed as soon as the origin of the complementary model is closed, the standard slice then being closed. This is where the definition has teeth: the image of a wild embedding need not be locally closed.
Local flatness is exactly being a slice embedding for the standard coordinate slice
F × {0} of F × F'. This is the characterisation to use downstream, where the definition of
TauCeti.IsLocallyFlat is not unfolded.
Local flatness spelled out pointwise: f is a topological embedding, and around every point of
its image there is an ambient chart in which the image is exactly the vanishing locus of the
complementary coordinates.
Codimension zero: with a trivial complementary model, over a space charted on F × F', locally
flat is exactly open embedding. In particular local flatness is strictly stronger than embedding:
not every embedding is locally flat.
The standard local model: over a space N charted on F, the inclusion of N as the slice
N × {0} of N × F' is locally flat, its flattening charts being the charts of N times the
identity. With N = F = ℝⁿ and F' = ℝᵏ this is the coordinate slice ℝⁿ × {0} ⊆ ℝⁿ⁺ᵏ that local
flatness is modelled on.
Graphs #
The graph of a continuous map is locally flat, with complementary model F.
A graph is flat. Let Φ identify M with F × F', and let g : F → M be a continuous
section of the first coordinate of Φ, so that Φ ∘ g is the graph of the continuous map
s ↦ (Φ (g s)).2. If on an open set U the set A agrees with the range of g, then shearing
Φ by that map, and restricting to U, gives a chart with source U flattening A onto the
standard slice F × {0}.
Local product neighbourhoods #
A flattening chart is already a local trivialisation once its target has been shrunk to a box, so a locally flat embedding has local product neighbourhoods in any codimension.
A locally flat embedding has local product neighbourhoods: every point of the domain has
an open neighbourhood U such that an open subset of the ambient space is a product U × G, in
which the map is the zero slice.
The complementary model is only asked to be a real seminormed space, so this covers every codimension. What is codimension-sensitive is patching these local products into a global one, which is not proved here.