Documentation

TauCeti.KnotTheory.HomologyConcordance

Knots in homology spheres and Levine's theorem #

Knots in integral homology 3-spheres are compared by homology concordance: two knots K₀ ⊆ Y₀ and K₁ ⊆ Y₁ are homology concordant when they cobound a smoothly and properly embedded annulus in some smooth integral homology cobordism between Y₀ and Y₁ (TauCeti.SmoothEmbedding.HomologyConcordant, with the circle as source). Every knot in S³ is homology concordant to a knot in S³, namely itself (TauCeti.not_forall_not_homologyConcordant_sphere).

Matsumoto asked (Kirby's problem 1.31) whether the knots in homology spheres bounding acyclic 4-manifolds are, up to homology concordance, just the knots in S³. Levine answered this negatively: there is a smooth compact contractible 4-manifold X and a knot K in its boundary Y = ∂X which is not homology concordant to any knot in S³. Since X is contractible, Y is an integral homology sphere, by Lefschetz duality. Levine states the result as: K bounds no piecewise-linear disc in any homology ball with boundary Y. This implies the statement here. A homology concordance W from K to a knot K' in S³, capped off by the four-ball along S³, would be a homology ball with boundary Y in which the annulus, together with the cone on K', is a piecewise-linear disc bounded by K.

TauCeti.LevineHomologyConcordanceTheorem records the statement in the smooth category, with ℤ coefficients. It is stated, not proved. The four-manifolds X and W are modelled on the half-space ℝ³ × [0, ∞), the model (𝓡 3).prod (𝓡∂ 1) of the cylinders over 3-manifolds; this is the half-space of Lee's Introduction to Smooth Manifolds. No orientations are imposed; by the discussion in TauCeti/Geometry/Manifold/SmoothEmbedding/HomologyConcordance.lean this only allows K' to be replaced by its mirror or reverse, which are again knots in S³.

Main definitions #

Main results #

References #

Levine's theorem (an answer to Kirby's problem 1.31): there are a smooth compact contractible 4-manifold X, whose boundary is a closed 3-manifold Y, and a knot K in Y that is not integrally homology concordant to any knot in S³.

The boundary of X is presented by a smooth embedding κ : Y → X onto it. The four-manifolds are modelled on the half-space ℝ³ × [0, ∞). It is recorded as a proposition and not proved.

Instances For

    Every knot in S³ is homology concordant to a knot in S³, namely itself, through the cylinder S³ × [0, 1]. So the conclusion of Levine's theorem fails for knots in S³: the boundary Y there is not S³.

    Levine's theorem gives a boundary that is not S³. Assuming Levine's theorem, some smooth compact contractible 4-manifold X has as boundary a closed 3-manifold Y not diffeomorphic to S³. A diffeomorphism e : Y ≃ₘ S³ would make the knot K of Levine's theorem homology concordant to the knot e ∘ K in S³ (TauCeti.SmoothEmbedding.homologyConcordant_transDiffeomorph).