The circles of two smoothings differing at one crossing #
An edge of the cube of resolutions of a PD-code joins two states s and t that agree at every
crossing except one crossing c. This file compares the circles of the two smoothed diagrams.
Smoothing only reconnects the four half-edges D.crossing c k at the crossing c, so a circle
avoiding these four half-edges is a circle of both smoothings: it consists of the same half-edges
in both (TauCeti.PDCode.eqvGen_circleStep_iff_of_notMem_circlesAt). This gives the bijection
TauCeti.PDCode.unchangedCircleEquiv between the circles of s and of t that do not pass
through c. The circles passing through c, TauCeti.PDCode.circlesAt D s c, are the circles of
the two half-edges in the opposite slots 0 and 2, since each local smoothing joins every slot to
one of its two neighbours. So one or two circles of each smoothing pass through c.
They are never two for both smoothings when s c ≠ t c
(TauCeti.PDCode.card_circlesAt_add_card_circlesAt_le_three). Delete the smoothing arcs at c
from either smoothed diagram: the half-edge x = D.crossing c 0 lies on a component of what
remains, the same for s and for t. If two circles of each smoothing passed through c, that
component would meet the four half-edges at c in x alone. It is closed under the arc matching,
so it has an even number of half-edges, and away from c it is closed under the remaining
smoothing arcs, so it has an even number of half-edges other than x; this is impossible.
So the circles passing through c change in one of three ways: two circles of s merge into one
circle of t, one circle of s splits into two circles of t, or one circle is replaced by one
circle. Nothing here uses planarity. For planar codes the last case does not occur, but it does
for the nonplanar code of two circles meeting in a single crossing. Whenever only one circle of t
passes through c, sending the circle of a half-edge to its circle in t is a well-defined map
TauCeti.PDCode.saddleCircleMap: it is the unchanged-circle bijection away from c and collapses
the circles of s through c onto the circle of t through c. It is the correspondence of
circles along which the saddle cobordism of a merge acts, and in reverse that of a split.
Main definitions #
TauCeti.PDCode.circlesAt: the circles of a smoothed diagram passing through a crossing.TauCeti.PDCode.unchangedCircleEquiv: the circles avoiding the crossingcare the same for two states agreeing away fromc.TauCeti.PDCode.saddleCircleMap: the correspondence of circles when one circle of the target passes throughc.
Main results #
TauCeti.PDCode.circlesAt_eq_pair: the circles throughcare those of the half-edges in slots0and2; in particular there are one or two of them (TauCeti.PDCode.card_circlesAt_le_two).TauCeti.PDCode.card_circlesAt_add_card_circlesAt_le_three: two states differing exactly atcdo not both have two circles throughc; if one has two, the other has one (TauCeti.PDCode.card_circlesAt_eq_one_of_card_circlesAt_eq_two).TauCeti.PDCode.stateLoopCount_add_card_circlesAt: the change in the number of circles is the change in the number of circles throughc; in particular it is at most one (TauCeti.PDCode.stateLoopCount_le_stateLoopCount_add_one).TauCeti.PDCode.eqvGen_circleStep_of_forall_card_circlesAt_eq_one: if only one circle oftpasses through each crossing at whichsandtdiffer, every circle ofslies on a circle oft.
References #
- M. Khovanov, A categorification of the Jones polynomial, Duke Math. J. 101 (2000), 359-426, §2 and §4.2 (the circles of neighbouring resolutions and the merge and split maps).
- D. Bar-Natan, On Khovanov's categorification of the Jones polynomial, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 2 (2002), 337-370, §2.
The circles through a crossing #
The circles of the diagram smoothed according to the state s that pass through the
crossing c: the circles of the four half-edges at c.
Instances For
The circles avoiding the crossing #
A circle avoiding the crossing c is a circle of every state agreeing away from c. If
the circle of x in the smoothing s does not pass through c, then the half-edges on the circle
of x are the same for the smoothings s and t.
The unchanged circles. For two states agreeing away from the crossing c, the circles
avoiding c are the same: the circle of a half-edge in one smoothing corresponds to its circle in
the other (TauCeti.PDCode.coe_unchangedCircleEquiv_mk).
Instances For
The unchanged-circle bijection sends the circle of a half-edge to its circle in the other smoothing.
The inverse of the unchanged-circle bijection sends the circle of a half-edge to its circle in the first smoothing.
Changing the smoothings at a set of crossings increases the number of circles by at most the number of changed crossings. No planarity assumption is needed.
The circles through the crossing #
Two states differing exactly at a crossing do not both have two circles through it. So along an edge of the cube of resolutions two circles merge into one, one circle splits into two, or one circle through the crossing is replaced by one circle.
If two circles of s pass through the crossing c at which s and t differ, then only one
circle of t does: the two circles of s merge.
Coarser smoothings #
If only one circle of t passes through each crossing at which s and t differ, then
half-edges on one circle of s lie on one circle of t.
The saddle correspondence #
If only one circle of t passes through the crossing c, then half-edges on one circle of
s lie on one circle of t.
The saddle correspondence of circles. When only one circle of t passes through the
crossing c, the circle of a half-edge in the smoothing s determines its circle in the
smoothing t (TauCeti.PDCode.saddleCircleMap_mk). This map is the unchanged-circle bijection
away from c (TauCeti.PDCode.saddleCircleMap_of_notMem) and sends the circles of s through c
onto the circle of t through c (TauCeti.PDCode.image_saddleCircleMap_circlesAt).
Instances For
Every circle of the target comes from a circle of the source.
Away from the crossing, the saddle correspondence is the unchanged-circle bijection.
The saddle correspondence sends the circles of the source through the crossing onto the circle of the target through the crossing.
When only one circle of each state passes through the crossing, the saddle correspondences in the two directions are mutually inverse.