Minkowski's theorems on the minima of a positive definite lattice #
Let L be a positive definite integral lattice of rank n, with successive minima
λ₀ ≤ ⋯ ≤ λ_{n-1} measured as norms B(x, x), so that λ₀ = min L. Minkowski's convex body
theorem, applied to a realization of L in ℝⁿ, bounds their product by the determinant:
λ₀ ⋯ λ_{n-1} ≤ cₙⁿ · det L, cₙ = (4 / π) · Γ(n / 2 + 1) ^ (2 / n).
This is Minkowski's second theorem, with the explicit constant cₙ of the convex body theorem for
the Euclidean ball; cₙ is an upper bound for the Hermite constant γₙ. Since every λᵢ is at
least min L, it contains Minkowski's bound for the minimum (his first theorem),
min L ≤ (4 / π) · Γ(n / 2 + 1) ^ (2 / n) · (det L) ^ (1 / n).
For the proof, let x₀, …, x_{n-1} be independent lattice vectors with B(xᵢ, xᵢ) = λᵢ, let
φ : L → ℝⁿ be a realization, and let e₀, …, e_{n-1} be the Gram–Schmidt orthonormalization of
φ x₀, …, φ x_{n-1}. If the last nonzero coordinate of φ y in the basis e is the k-th, then
y is independent of x₀, …, x_{k-1}, so B(y, y) ≥ λₖ and hence ∑ⱼ ⟪eⱼ, φ y⟫² / λⱼ ≥ 1. The
open ellipsoid ∑ⱼ ⟪eⱼ, v⟫² / λⱼ < 1 thus contains no nonzero vector of φ(L), and by the convex
body theorem its volume √(λ₀ ⋯ λ_{n-1}) · π^(n/2) / Γ(n/2 + 1) is at most 2ⁿ times the covolume
√(det L).
The bounds are stated without real powers, as (∏ᵢ λᵢ) · πⁿ ≤ 4ⁿ · Γ(n/2 + 1)² · det L and
(min L)ⁿ · πⁿ ≤ 4ⁿ · Γ(n/2 + 1)² · det L, and the bound for the minimum also in the root form
displayed above. None needs a rank hypothesis: in rank zero the product is empty, the minimum is
0, and all statements hold trivially.
Main results #
TauCeti.IntegralLattice.exists_ne_zero_mem_of_two_pow_mul_sqrt_determinant_lt: the convex body theorem for a realization of a nondegenerate lattice: a symmetric convex set of volume greater than2ⁿ √(det L)contains a nonzero lattice vector.TauCeti.IntegralLattice.IsPosDef.prod_successiveMinimum_mul_pi_pow_le: Minkowski's second theorem,(∏ᵢ λᵢ) · πⁿ ≤ 4ⁿ · Γ(n/2 + 1)² · det L.TauCeti.IntegralLattice.IsPosDef.minimum_pow_mul_pi_pow_le:(min L)ⁿ · πⁿ ≤ 4ⁿ · Γ(n/2 + 1)² · det L.TauCeti.IntegralLattice.IsPosDef.minimum_le_mul_determinant_rpow:min L ≤ (4 / π) · Γ(n/2 + 1) ^ (2/n) · (det L) ^ (1/n).
References #
- J. W. S. Cassels, An Introduction to the Geometry of Numbers, Chapter III, §2, Chapter VIII, and Chapter X.
- J. H. Conway and N. J. A. Sloane, Sphere Packings, Lattices and Groups, Chapter 1, §1.5.
Minkowski's convex body theorem for a realized lattice. Let φ realize a nondegenerate
integral lattice L in a real inner product space E of dimension n. A convex set K ⊆ E,
symmetric about the origin, of volume greater than 2ⁿ · √(det L) contains φ y for some
nonzero y ∈ L.
Minkowski's second theorem. The successive minima λ₀, …, λ_{n-1} of a positive definite
integral lattice of rank n satisfy (∏ᵢ λᵢ) · πⁿ ≤ 4ⁿ · Γ(n/2 + 1)² · det L, that is,
∏ᵢ λᵢ ≤ cₙⁿ · det L with cₙ = (4 / π) · Γ(n/2 + 1) ^ (2/n) the constant of Minkowski's bound for
the minimum.
Minkowski's bound for the minimum, without roots. A positive definite integral lattice of
rank n satisfies (min L)ⁿ · πⁿ ≤ 4ⁿ · Γ(n/2 + 1)² · det L.
Minkowski's bound for the minimum. A positive definite integral lattice of rank n
satisfies min L ≤ (4 / π) · Γ(n/2 + 1) ^ (2/n) · (det L) ^ (1/n).