The pinned Geck carrier is full-weight in the unimodular types #
The explicit Chevalley carrier TauCeti.DynkinType.geckGroupScheme of a valid Dynkin type is the
smallest closed subgroup scheme of GLₙ over ℤ containing the divided-power exponential root
subgroups of the numbered Chevalley generators together with the weight torus of Geck's admissible
lattice. Whether it is a candidate for the simply connected form turns on one thing: the torus
acts through the lattice generated by the weights of the representation, and that lattice has to
be the whole weight lattice.
For the Geck lattice the generated lattice is the root lattice
(TauCeti.DynkinType.span_range_geckWeight_eq_span_range_root), which is the whole weight lattice
precisely in the three unimodular types E₈, F₄ and G₂. This file draws the consequence for
the carrier's torus in those types, in both of the forms a consumer uses: the weight torus is a
closed subgroup scheme of the carrier, and it is injective on points over every value algebra.
Neither form is transported from the other, since the identification of the point group
Fin rank → Aˣ with the scheme-theoretic points of the split torus is not available. The
two general criteria live beside the carrier in
TauCeti.LinearAlgebra.RootSystem.SimplyConnectedRootDatum.GeckLattice.GroupScheme, and both are
stated against the finite-ordinal weights TauCeti.DynkinType.geckWeightFin that the construction
consumes, so the bridge to the merged spanning results is the reindexing lemma
TauCeti.DynkinType.range_geckWeightFin.
Nothing here asserts that the Geck carrier is reductive, that its weight torus is a maximal torus, or that the carrier realizes the pinned root datum; those remain Layer 9 work. Neither does anything here bear on the other six valid diagrams, where the Geck weights generate only the proper root sublattice, so that a larger admissible lattice is needed before the same two statements can hold.
Main results #
TauCeti.DynkinType.range_geckWeightFin: the finite-ordinal reindexing does not change the set of Geck weights, so the two spanning conditions agree (TauCeti.DynkinType.span_range_geckWeightFin_eq_top_iff).TauCeti.DynkinType.isClosedImmersion_geckWeightTorus_E8, and the analogousF4andG2instances, imported fromGeckLattice.Torus: the weight torus is a closed subgroup scheme of the carrier.TauCeti.DynkinType.geckTorusPoints_E8_injective, and the analogousF4andG2results: the weight torus is injective on points.
References #
The identification of the character lattice of the torus with the lattice generated by the weights
of an admissible lattice, and its role in separating the simply connected and adjoint forms,
follow J. E. Humphreys, Linear Algebraic Groups, §27, and J. C. Jantzen, Representations of
Algebraic Groups, II.1. The unimodularity of the E₈, F₄ and G₂ Cartan matrices is Bourbaki,
Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, Chapters 4--6, Plates VII--IX.
This advances "Pinnings" and "Points over an algebraically closed field" in Layer 9 of
TauCetiRoadmap/ReductiveGroups/README.md, whose consumer is milestone L0 of
TauCetiRoadmap/CFSGStatement/README.md, the pinned simply connected ambient group of a valid
Lie-type index.
Reindexing the Geck weights by a finite ordinal does not change the set of weights.
The finite-ordinal Geck weights generate the character lattice exactly when the Geck weights do. This is the bridge between the weights the carrier is built from and the weights the spanning results are stated for.
The three unimodular types #
The weight torus of the pinned Geck carrier of type E₈ is injective on points.
The weight torus of the pinned Geck carrier of type F₄ is injective on points.
The weight torus of the pinned Geck carrier of type G₂ is injective on points.