Documentation

TauCeti.LinearAlgebra.Trace.Nilpotent

Traces and nilpotent endomorphisms in characteristic zero #

Over a field of characteristic zero, an endomorphism f of a finite-dimensional vector space is nilpotent exactly when the traces of all its positive powers vanish. One direction holds over any reduced ring. For the other, factor the characteristic polynomial as X ^ m * q with q(0) ≠ 0 and choose a Bézout identity a * X ^ (m + 1) + b * q = 1. Then a(f) * f ^ (m + 1) is an idempotent polynomial in f with zero constant term. Its trace is its rank and also vanishes, so it is zero, q(f) is invertible, and f ^ m = 0.

Two consequences for a pair of endomorphisms A, B with ⁅A, ⁅A, B⁆⁆ = 0 follow.

Applied to the adjoint representation, the last statement says that an ad-nilpotent element is Killing-orthogonal to every element that its adjoint action kills twice. This is the input to the construction of the neutral element of an sl₂-triple in the Jacobson–Morozov theorem.

Main results #

References #

theorem LinearMap.isNilpotent_iff_forall_trace_pow_eq_zero {K : Type u_1} {M : Type u_2} [Field K] [AddCommGroup M] [Module K M] [FiniteDimensional K M] [CharZero K] {f : Module.End K M} :
IsNilpotent f ↔ ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < k → (trace K M) (f ^ k) = 0

Trace criterion for nilpotence. Over a field of characteristic zero, an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional vector space is nilpotent if and only if the traces of all its positive powers vanish.

Jacobson's lemma on commutators. In characteristic zero, if A commutes with ⁅A, B⁆, then ⁅A, B⁆ is nilpotent: each of its positive powers is a commutator with A, hence traceless.

theorem LinearMap.trace_mul_eq_zero_of_isNilpotent_of_lie_lie_eq_zero {K : Type u_1} {M : Type u_2} [Field K] [AddCommGroup M] [Module K M] [FiniteDimensional K M] [CharZero K] {A B : Module.End K M} (hA : IsNilpotent A) (h : ⁅A, ⁅A, B⁆⁆ = 0) :
(trace K M) (A * B) = 0

The trace of A * B vanishes when A is nilpotent and commutes with ⁅A, B⁆. In characteristic zero, the trace of A * B on ker (A ^ i) is independent of i, since B raises and A lowers the index by one and ⁅A, B⁆ is nilpotent by Jacobson's lemma.