Documentation

TauCeti.LowDimTopology.Heegaard.SpincAdmissibility

Weak admissibility for a fixed spin^c structure #

Weak admissibility of a pointed Heegaard diagram (TauCeti.HeegaardRegionSystem.WeaklyAdmissible) asks every nonzero periodic domain to have coefficients of both signs. Ozsváth and Szabó only need this for the periodic domains P that pair to zero with the first Chern class of the spin^c structure s under consideration: the diagram is weakly admissible for s when every nonzero periodic domain P with ⟨c₁(s), H(P)⟩ = 0 has both positive and negative coefficients.

For a generator x with s_z(x) = s, the pairing ⟨c₁(s), H(P)⟩ is the Maslov index of P at x (Ozsváth–Szabó, Theorem 4.9), which on the incidence data TauCeti.HeegaardRegionSystem is the combinatorial Maslov index TauCeti.HeegaardRegionSystem.maslovIndex with region Euler characteristics χ. So we define weak admissibility at a generator x, TauCeti.HeegaardRegionSystem.WeaklyAdmissibleAt, by the condition on periodic domains of Maslov index zero at x; it depends only on the class of x under the relation of being joined by a domain, as the spin^c structure does. The identification of the Maslov index of a periodic domain with the Chern class pairing is geometric and is not formalized here.

Weak admissibility implies weak admissibility at every generator, and so does strong admissibility at that generator (TauCeti.HeegaardRegionSystem.StronglyAdmissible, in TauCeti.LowDimTopology.Heegaard.StrongAdmissibility). When every periodic domain has Maslov index zero at x, as for a torsion spin^c structure, the two weak conditions agree. In general they do not: the genus-one diagram of S¹ × S² with its basepoint in a bigon is weakly admissible at both of its generators, although it is not weakly admissible (TauCeti.HeegaardRegionSystem.weaklyAdmissibleAt_circleTimesSphere_one).

Weak admissibility at y is exactly what makes the set of nonnegative domains from any x to y with prescribed basepoint multiplicities and prescribed Maslov index finite; this is the finiteness behind the hat differential of a single spin^c summand. It is also the existence of strictly positive region areas for which every periodic domain of Maslov index zero has signed area zero, and for such areas all domains from x to y with the same basepoint multiplicities and the same Maslov index have the same area: the energy bound for holomorphic disks once their energy is identified with the area of their domain.

Main definitions #

Main results #

References #

def TauCeti.HeegaardRegionSystem.WeaklyAdmissibleAt {n : ℕ} {Point : Type u_1} {Region : Type u_2} {Basepoint : Type u_3} (H : HeegaardRegionSystem n Point Region Basepoint) [Fintype Point] [Fintype Region] [DecidableEq Region] (χ : Region → ℤ) (x : H.Generator) :

Weak admissibility at the generator x, for the region Euler characteristics χ: every nonzero periodic domain of Maslov index zero at x has both positive and negative coefficients. On a genuine Heegaard diagram with its region Euler characteristics χ, this corresponds by Ozsváth–Szabó Theorem 4.9 to weak admissibility for the spin^c structure s_z(x); that identification is not formalized.

Instances For
    theorem TauCeti.HeegaardRegionSystem.weaklyAdmissibleAt_def {n : ℕ} {Point : Type u_1} {Region : Type u_2} {Basepoint : Type u_3} {H : HeegaardRegionSystem n Point Region Basepoint} [Fintype Point] [Fintype Region] [DecidableEq Region] {χ : Region → ℤ} {x : H.Generator} :
    H.WeaklyAdmissibleAt χ x ↔ ∀ P ∈ H.periodicDomains, (H.maslovIndex χ x x) P = 0 → P ≠ 0 → (∃ (r : Region), 0 < P r) ∧ ∃ (r : Region), P r < 0

    Weak admissibility at x means every nonzero periodic domain of Maslov index zero at x has both positive and negative coefficients.

    theorem TauCeti.HeegaardRegionSystem.weaklyAdmissibleAt_iff {n : ℕ} {Point : Type u_1} {Region : Type u_2} {Basepoint : Type u_3} {H : HeegaardRegionSystem n Point Region Basepoint} [Fintype Point] [Fintype Region] [DecidableEq Region] {χ : Region → ℤ} {x : H.Generator} :
    H.WeaklyAdmissibleAt χ x ↔ ∀ P ∈ H.periodicDomains, (H.maslovIndex χ x x) P = 0 → 0 ≤ P → P = 0

    A diagram is weakly admissible at x exactly when its only nonnegative periodic domain of Maslov index zero at x is zero.

    theorem TauCeti.HeegaardRegionSystem.weaklyAdmissibleAt_iff_of_isDomainBetween {n : ℕ} {Point : Type u_1} {Region : Type u_2} {Basepoint : Type u_3} {H : HeegaardRegionSystem n Point Region Basepoint} [Fintype Point] [Fintype Region] [DecidableEq Region] {χ : Region → ℤ} {x y : H.Generator} {D : Region → ℤ} (hD : IsDomainBetween x y D) :

    Weak admissibility at a generator is the same at generators joined by a domain: a periodic domain has the same Maslov index at both.

    theorem TauCeti.HeegaardRegionSystem.WeaklyAdmissible.weaklyAdmissibleAt {n : ℕ} {Point : Type u_1} {Region : Type u_2} {Basepoint : Type u_3} {H : HeegaardRegionSystem n Point Region Basepoint} [Fintype Point] [Fintype Region] [DecidableEq Region] (hH : H.WeaklyAdmissible) (χ : Region → ℤ) (x : H.Generator) :

    A weakly admissible diagram is weakly admissible at every generator.

    theorem TauCeti.HeegaardRegionSystem.weaklyAdmissibleAt_iff_weaklyAdmissible {n : ℕ} {Point : Type u_1} {Region : Type u_2} {Basepoint : Type u_3} {H : HeegaardRegionSystem n Point Region Basepoint} [Fintype Point] [Fintype Region] [DecidableEq Region] {χ : Region → ℤ} {x : H.Generator} (hP : ∀ P ∈ H.periodicDomains, (H.maslovIndex χ x x) P = 0) :

    If every periodic domain has Maslov index zero at x, as for the generators of a torsion spin^c structure, then weak admissibility at x is weak admissibility.

    theorem TauCeti.HeegaardRegionSystem.weaklyAdmissibleAt_iff_exists_pos_forall_sum_mul_eq_zero {n : ℕ} {Point : Type u_1} {Region : Type u_2} {Basepoint : Type u_3} (H : HeegaardRegionSystem n Point Region Basepoint) [Fintype Point] [Fintype Region] [DecidableEq Region] {χ : Region → ℤ} {x : H.Generator} :
    H.WeaklyAdmissibleAt χ x ↔ ∃ (A : Region → ℝ), (∀ (r : Region), 0 < A r) ∧ ∀ P ∈ H.periodicDomains, (H.maslovIndex χ x x) P = 0 → ∑ r : Region, A r * ↑(P r) = 0

    A diagram is weakly admissible at x exactly when its regions carry strictly positive areas A for which every periodic domain of Maslov index zero at x has signed area ∑ r, A r * P r equal to zero.

    theorem TauCeti.HeegaardRegionSystem.IsDomainBetween.sub_mem_periodicDomains_inf_ker_maslovIndex {n : ℕ} {Point : Type u_1} {Region : Type u_2} {Basepoint : Type u_3} {H : HeegaardRegionSystem n Point Region Basepoint} [Fintype Point] [Fintype Region] [DecidableEq Region] {χ : Region → ℤ} {x y : H.Generator} {D D' : Region → ℤ} (hD : IsDomainBetween x y D) (hD' : IsDomainBetween x y D') (hz : ∀ (z : Basepoint), D' (H.basepoint z) = D (H.basepoint z)) (hμ : (H.maslovIndex χ x y) D' = (H.maslovIndex χ x y) D) :
    D' - D ∈ H.periodicDomains ⊓ (H.maslovIndex χ y y).ker

    Two domains from x to y with the same basepoint multiplicities and the same Maslov index differ by a periodic domain of Maslov index zero at y.

    theorem TauCeti.HeegaardRegionSystem.IsDomainBetween.sum_mul_eq_of_maslovIndex_eq {n : ℕ} {Point : Type u_1} {Region : Type u_2} {Basepoint : Type u_3} {H : HeegaardRegionSystem n Point Region Basepoint} [Fintype Point] [Fintype Region] [DecidableEq Region] {χ : Region → ℤ} {x y : H.Generator} {A : Region → ℝ} (hA : ∀ P ∈ H.periodicDomains, (H.maslovIndex χ y y) P = 0 → ∑ r : Region, A r * ↑(P r) = 0) {D D' : Region → ℤ} (hD : IsDomainBetween x y D) (hD' : IsDomainBetween x y D') (hz : ∀ (z : Basepoint), D' (H.basepoint z) = D (H.basepoint z)) (hμ : (H.maslovIndex χ x y) D' = (H.maslovIndex χ x y) D) :
    ∑ r : Region, A r * ↑(D' r) = ∑ r : Region, A r * ↑(D r)

    If an area form A vanishes on the periodic domains of Maslov index zero at y, then all domains from x to y with the same basepoint multiplicities and the same Maslov index have the same area.

    theorem TauCeti.HeegaardRegionSystem.WeaklyAdmissibleAt.finite_setOf_isDomainBetween_basepoint_eq_nonneg_index {n : ℕ} {Point : Type u_1} {Region : Type u_2} {Basepoint : Type u_3} {H : HeegaardRegionSystem n Point Region Basepoint} [Fintype Point] [Fintype Region] [DecidableEq Region] {χ : Region → ℤ} {y : H.Generator} (hH : H.WeaklyAdmissibleAt χ y) (x : H.Generator) (k : Basepoint → ℤ) (m : ℚ) :
    {D : Region → ℤ | IsDomainBetween x y D ∧ (∀ (z : Basepoint), D (H.basepoint z) = k z) ∧ 0 ≤ D ∧ (H.maslovIndex χ x y) D = m}.Finite

    In a diagram weakly admissible at y, only finitely many nonnegative domains connect x to y with prescribed basepoint multiplicities k and Maslov index m.

    theorem TauCeti.HeegaardRegionSystem.weaklyAdmissibleAt_iff_forall_finite {n : ℕ} {Point : Type u_1} {Region : Type u_2} {Basepoint : Type u_3} {H : HeegaardRegionSystem n Point Region Basepoint} [Fintype Point] [Fintype Region] [DecidableEq Region] {χ : Region → ℤ} {y : H.Generator} :
    H.WeaklyAdmissibleAt χ y ↔ ∀ (x : H.Generator) (k : Basepoint → ℤ) (m : ℚ), {D : Region → ℤ | IsDomainBetween x y D ∧ (∀ (z : Basepoint), D (H.basepoint z) = k z) ∧ 0 ≤ D ∧ (H.maslovIndex χ x y) D = m}.Finite

    A diagram is weakly admissible at y exactly when, for every generator x, basepoint multiplicities k and Maslov index m, only finitely many nonnegative domains connect x to y with these basepoint multiplicities and this Maslov index. Without weak admissibility at y, the multiples of a nonzero nonnegative periodic domain of Maslov index zero are infinitely many such domains from y to itself.