Lᵖ seminorm bounds out of bounds between the integrals ∫⁻ ‖·‖ₑ ^ p #
For 0 < p < ∞ the Lᵖ seminorm of an a.e. strongly measurable v is the p-th root of
∫⁻ ‖v x‖ₑ ^ p ∂μ (a function that is not a.e. strongly measurable has seminorm ∞), so a
bound ∫⁻ ‖v‖ₑ ^ p ≤ c ^ p * ∫⁻ ‖w‖ₑ ^ p between those integrals implies the bound
‖v‖_p ≤ c * ‖w‖_p between the seminorms. This file records that implication, which is the
direction an estimate proved by integration produces.
The two functions are allowed to take values in different spaces, and those spaces need carry
nothing beyond an extended norm, since that is all eLpNorm reads. In particular the statement
covers comparing a function with its derivative.
Main declarations #
TauCeti.eLpNorm_rpow_eq_lintegral: for an a.e. measurableℝ≥0∞-valued function, thep-th power of theLᵖseminorm is the integral∫⁻ f ^ p.TauCeti.eLpNorm_le_of_ae_tendsto_ennreal: anℝ≥0∞-valued Fatou lemma for theLᵖseminorm.TauCeti.eLpNorm_le_eLpNorm_of_lintegral_rpow_le: for an a.e. strongly measurablev, from∫⁻ ‖v‖ₑ ^ p ≤ c ^ p * ∫⁻ ‖w‖ₑ ^ pconclude‖v‖_p ≤ c * ‖w‖_p; no measurability ofwis needed.TauCeti.rpow_lintegral_le_measure_univ_rpow_mul: Hölder's extended-valued integral inequality(∫⁻ u) ^ r ≤ μ univ ^ (r - 1) * ∫⁻ u ^ rforu : α → ℝ≥0∞. On a finite measure space it expresses the nestingL^r ⊆ L¹; for a generalμit is only the inequality.
For a finite nonzero exponent, the p-th power of the Lᵖ seminorm of an a.e. measurable
ℝ≥0∞-valued function is the integral of the p-th power of that function. This is
MeasureTheory.lintegral_rpow_enorm_eq_rpow_eLpNorm' read at an ℝ≥0∞-valued exponent and at a
function whose enorm is the identity, which is the shape the extended-valued estimates use.
Fatou's lemma for the Lᵖ seminorm of ℝ≥0∞-valued functions. For a finite nonzero
exponent, an almost everywhere pointwise limit of functions whose Lᵖ seminorms are bounded by
c also has Lᵖ seminorm at most c.
Turn a bound between the ∫⁻ ‖·‖ₑ ^ p integrals into a bound between the Lᵖ seminorms.
The two functions may have different codomains, which is what lets such a bound compare a
function with its derivative; only a topology and an extended norm on each is needed.
Only the function on the left has to be a.e. strongly measurable: without that its Lᵖ seminorm
is ∞ by definition, whatever the integral bound says, while a non-measurable w only makes the
right-hand side larger.
Hölder's inequality in extended-valued ∫⁻ form, raised to the power r: the L¹
integral of u : α → ℝ≥0∞ is controlled by its L^r integral at the cost of the factor
μ univ ^ (r - 1). Stated for an ℝ≥0∞-valued u, so a norm-valued application passes
fun x => ‖f x‖ₑ and needs only that this composite is measurable.
On a finite measure space this is the nesting L^r ⊆ L¹; for a general μ it is only the
displayed inequality, which does not by itself give that inclusion. No finiteness is assumed, and
the bound is not vacuous when μ univ = ∞: arithmetic in ℝ≥0∞ makes the right-hand side 0
rather than ∞ whenever ∫⁻ ‖f‖ₑ ^ r = 0, and the inequality still holds there because f then
vanishes almost everywhere.