The Wasserstein distance at the infinite exponent #
At p = ∞ the Wasserstein distance TauCeti.wassersteinEDist ∞ μ ν is the infimum, over the
couplings π of μ and ν, of the π-essential supremum of the ground distance
(TauCeti.wassersteinEDist_top). On an extended pseudometric space with Polish topology, this file
proves two facts that tie this endpoint to the finite exponents and make it usable:
- the infimum is attained, between any two finite measures that admit a coupling;
- for probability measures,
W_∞ (μ, ν)is the supremum of the finite-exponent distancesW_p (μ, ν), and it is their limit asp → ∞.
Both are identities in [0, ∞]: no bounded support or moment hypothesis is needed, since a
divergent supremum and an infinite W_∞ are allowed on both sides. Monotonicity in the exponent,
TauCeti.wassersteinEDist_mono_exponent, makes the supremum over all finite exponents the same as
the supremum over 1 ≤ p < ∞.
Main statements #
TauCeti.wassersteinEDist_top_eq_iSup—W_∞ (μ, ν) = ⨆ p < ∞, W_p (μ, ν)whenμis a probability measure;TauCeti.tendsto_wassersteinEDist_atTop—W_p (μ, ν) → W_∞ (μ, ν)asp → ∞;TauCeti.exists_isCoupling_eLpNorm_top_eq_wassersteinEDist— attainment of the infimum definingW_∞, between finite measures that admit a coupling.
Implementation notes #
Monotonicity gives ⨆ p < ∞, W_p ≤ W_∞. For the other inequality, write L for the supremum.
The couplings π with ‖d‖_{Lⁿ(π)} ≤ L form a decreasing sequence of nonempty weakly closed
subsets of the weakly compact set of couplings: nonempty by attainment at finite exponents, closed
because π ↦ ∫⁻ dⁿ ∂π is lower semicontinuous. A coupling in their intersection has all its Lⁿ
displacements at most L, hence its essential-supremum displacement is at most L, because the
Lⁿ seminorms of a function converge to its essential supremum
(TauCeti.tendsto_eLpNorm_atTop). That coupling attains W_∞, which is how attainment and the
supremum formula come out of the same argument.
References #
- C. R. Givens and R. M. Shortt, A class of Wasserstein metrics for probability distributions,
Michigan Math. J. 31 (1984), 231–240, Proposition 1: on a Polish space,
W_∞is the limit of theW_pasp → ∞, and the infimum defining it is attained.
W_∞ is the supremum of the finite-exponent Wasserstein distances. On an extended
pseudometric space with Polish topology, if μ is a probability measure then
W_∞ (μ, ν) = ⨆ p < ∞, W_p (μ, ν) in [0, ∞]. By
monotonicity in the exponent the supremum may equally be taken over 1 ≤ p < ∞.
W_p converges to W_∞. On an extended pseudometric space with Polish topology, if
μ is a probability measure then
W_p (μ, ν) tends to W_∞ (μ, ν) in [0, ∞] as the exponent p tends to infinity.
Attainment at the infinite exponent. On an extended pseudometric space with Polish
topology, the infimum defining
W_∞ (μ, ν) between two finite measures that admit a coupling is a minimum: some coupling has
essential-supremum displacement exactly W_∞ (μ, ν).
A bound on W_∞ is realized by a coupling whose displacement satisfies that bound almost
everywhere. Feasibility is explicit so the statement also holds for the bound ∞.