The higher prime powers in the logarithm of the Dedekind Euler product #
Taking logarithms in the Euler product ΞΆ_K(s) = β_π (1 - N(π) ^ (-s))β»ΒΉ turns it into the
double sum β_π β_{m β₯ 1} N(π) ^ (-m s) / m, whose m = 1 part is the prime Dirichlet series
NumberField.Set.primeIdealZetaSum Set.univ s. This file bounds everything else: the m β₯ 2
part, equivalently the difference β_π (-log (1 - N(π) ^ (-s)) - N(π) ^ (-s)), is nonnegative
and at most 2 [K : β].
The bound is uniform on all of s β₯ 1, endpoint included, and that endpoint is the whole point:
at s = 1 the Euler-factor logarithm sum and the prime Dirichlet series each diverge, while
their termwise difference still converges, because discarding the linear term of
-log (1 - x) replaces the exponent -s by the exponent -2 s, and 2 s β₯ 2 already
converges.
Two elementary inputs carry the argument.
- A height-one prime
πhasN(π) β₯ 2, soN(π) ^ (-s) β€ 1 / 2fors β₯ 1and the denominator1 - N(π) ^ (-s)is bounded below by1 / 2; the termwise difference is therefore at mostN(π) ^ (-2). N(π)is at least the rational prime belowπand at most[K : β]primes lie over one rational prime, soβ_π N(π) ^ (-2) β€ 2 [K : β]. That bound is not proved again here: it is the importedTauCeti.tsum_absNorm_rpow_neg_two_le.
Main results #
TauCeti.summable_neg_log_one_sub_sub_absNorm_rpow: the termwise difference between the Euler-factor logarithm and the prime Dirichlet term is summable for everys > 1 / 2.TauCeti.tsum_neg_log_one_sub_sub_absNorm_rpow_nonneg: termwise nonnegativity fors > 0yields a nonnegativetsum; convergence is supplied separately fors > 1 / 2.TauCeti.tsum_neg_log_one_sub_sub_absNorm_rpow_le: it is at most2 [K : β]for everys β₯ 1; together the two bound the sum in[0, 2 [K : β]]ons β₯ 1.TauCeti.abs_tsum_neg_log_one_sub_sub_primeIdealZetaSum_le: fors > 1, where the two sums converge separately, the sum of the Euler-factor logarithms differs fromNumberField.Set.primeIdealZetaSum Set.univ sby at most2 [K : β].
Implementation notes #
The constant is explicit rather than existentially quantified, and the upper bound's hypothesis
is the closed condition 1 β€ s rather than a neighbourhood of 1: both are free here, and a
consumer that wants an eventual statement near s = 1 gets it by weakening, whereas the
converse costs work.
The two halves carry different hypotheses on purpose. Nonnegativity holds as soon as
N(π) ^ (-s) < 1, so it is stated on 0 < s; the uniform upper bound uses
N(π) ^ (-s) β€ 1 / 2. No uniform bound can persist as s β 1 / 2, where the dominating
prime series approaches its convergence endpoint.
The one-variable estimate behind the termwise bound is not proved again: it is Mathlib's
Complex.norm_log_one_sub_inv_sub_self_le read along the reals, which is where the factor 2
in the denominator below comes from.
Convergence of β_π N(π) ^ (-s) over all height-one primes for 1 < s is not proved again
either: it is TauCeti.summable_absNorm_rpow_primes_of_one_lt.
References #
- J. Neukirch, Algebraic Number Theory, Chapter VII, Β§13.
- J.-P. Serre, A Course in Arithmetic, Chapter VI, Β§3.
- C. Birkbeck and R. Brasca,
CebotarevDensity/Density.leanin CBirkbeck/chebotarev-density, Apache-2.0, commit8575c9df1ae0a61120ab5c964c7911414254bec7, declarationsprimeIdealZetaHigherTail_boundedandneg_log_one_sub_sub_le.
The prime-power tail #
The prime-power tail is summable. The termwise difference between the Euler-factor
logarithm -log (1 - N(π) ^ (-s)) and the prime Dirichlet term N(π) ^ (-s) is summable for
every s > 1 / 2; at s = 1 this remains summable although either of the two families from which
it is built is not.
The prime-power tail is termwise nonnegative. For every s > 0, termwise nonnegativity
yields a nonnegative tsum. This statement does not assert summability; that is supplied by
TauCeti.summable_neg_log_one_sub_sub_absNorm_rpow for s > 1 / 2.
The prime-power tail is bounded uniformly on s β₯ 1. The constant 2 [K : β] does not
depend on s, so this survives the passage to the limit s β 1βΊ that the Dirichlet-density
normalization needs.
The Euler-factor logarithms sum to the prime Dirichlet series up to O(1). For s > 1,
where both series converge, β_π -log (1 - N(π) ^ (-s)) differs from
NumberField.Set.primeIdealZetaSum Set.univ s by at most the constant 2 [K : β].
The absolute value is here so that the statement can be used directly as an O(1) estimate; the
difference is in fact nonnegative β see TauCeti.tsum_neg_log_one_sub_sub_absNorm_rpow_nonneg.