The Γ₀(N)-double coset of a diagonal matrix #
diag(a₁, a₂) lies in Δ₀(N) as soon as a₁ is coprime to the level — the lower-left entry
vanishes, so the only condition beyond integrality and positive determinant is that the
upper-left entry be a unit modulo N. That gives the Γ₀(N)-level
analogue diagCosetGamma0 of diagCoset, and it sits over the level-one one:
toLevelOneCoset N (diagCosetGamma0 N a hgcd) = diagCoset a
These are the double cosets the level-N Hecke operators are built from — T(a₁, a₂) at
level N. The bridge identifies the image of the level-N coset under toLevelOneCoset
with diagCoset a; it says nothing about the Hecke-ring operations, and it does not by itself
supply the coprime-determinant hypothesis that toLevelOneCoset_injOn needs.
Ported from the AINTLIB LeanModularForms project
(LeanModularForms/HeckeRIngs/GLn/CongruenceHecke/Props.lean, Chris Birkbeck,
https://github.com/CBirkbeck/AINTLIB/tree/main/projects/LeanModularForms), the
diagMat_mem_Delta0_of_gcd and T_diag_Gamma0 declarations.
Main definitions #
HeckeRing.GL2.diagCosetGamma0: theΓ₀(N)-double coset ofdiag(a).
Main results #
HeckeRing.GL2.natDiagGL_mem_Delta0_of_coprime:diag(a) ∈ Δ₀(N)whena₁is coprime toN.HeckeRing.GL2.diagCosetGamma0_toSet: its underlying set.HeckeRing.GL2.toLevelOneCoset_diagCosetGamma0: theΓ₀(N)-coset ofdiag(a)lies over the level-one cosetT(a).HeckeRing.GL2.diagCosetGamma0_one: the all-ones tuple gives the identity coset.HeckeRing.GL2.diagCosetGamma0_of_not_pos: so does any tuple that is not everywhere positive.HeckeRing.GL2.doubleCoset_out_diagCosetGamma0_const_eq_iUnion_rightCosets: a scalar double coset is a single right coset.HeckeRing.GL2.coprimeDetCoset_diagCosetGamma0_of_coprime: the coset ofdiag(a)has determinant prime tomwhena₀ a₁is.
References #
A diagonal whose upper-left entry is coprime to N lies in Δ₀(N): the lower-left entry
is zero, so only the unit condition has content — and when positivity fails natDiagGL is the
identity, which is in Δ₀(N) anyway. Coprimality is therefore only needed in the positive
branch, and the hypothesis asks for it only there.
The Γ₀(N)-double coset of diag(a) when the upper-left entry is coprime to the level:
the level-N analogue of diagCoset.
Coprimality stays in the signature because it is what puts the matrix in Δ₀(N), but only
under positivity: without it natDiagGL falls back to the identity, which lies in Δ₀(N)
regardless of the level.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Defining equation for the sealed definition diagCosetGamma0.
The underlying set of diagCosetGamma0 a is the Γ₀(N)-double coset of diag(a).
The Γ₀(N)-coset of diag(a) lies over the level-one coset T(a): widening both
coefficient subgroups from Γ₀(N) to SL₂(ℤ) along toLevelOneCoset gives the double coset
of the same representative, hence exactly diagCoset a. (The Γ₀(N)-coset itself is in
general strictly smaller than the level-one one.)
The identity normal form, mirroring diagCoset_one: the all-ones tuple gives the identity
double coset, whatever proof of the coprimality condition is supplied.
The junk normal form, mirroring diagCoset_of_not_pos: a tuple that is not everywhere
positive gives the identity coset, matching the junk value of natDiagGL. The coprimality
condition is vacuous in this branch, so it is irrelevant which proof is supplied.
The representative of the Γ₀(N)-coset of diag(a) differs from diag(a) by a left and a
right factor in Γ₀(N).
The scalar Γ₀(N) double coset is the single right coset represented by its natural
diagonal matrix. The coprimality hypothesis is only needed on the positive branch, matching
the junk-branch convention of diagCosetGamma0: at c = 0 the representative is the
identity and the statement is the trivial decomposition of Γ₀(N) itself.
The scalar double coset has degree one: diag(c, c) is central, so its Γ₀(N)-double
coset is a single right coset. The level-N companion of degree_diagCoset_const; it is what
bounds the multiplicity of a product one of whose factors is scalar.
A diagonal double coset has determinant prime to m as soon as a₀ a₁ is: the
determinant of diag(a₀, a₁) is a₀ a₁. At m = Q for an exact divisor Q of the level this is
the hypothesis CoprimeDetCoset N Q under which the Hecke operator T(a₀, a₁) commutes with the
Atkin–Lehner operator W_Q; at m = N it is the one for the Fricke operator.