The Γ₀(N) double coset of a coprime-determinant element #
Shimura, Lemma 3.29(3). For α ∈ Δ₀(N) whose determinant is coprime to N,
SL₂(ℤ) α SL₂(ℤ) ∩ Δ₀(N) = Γ₀(N) α Γ₀(N).
The right-hand side is always contained in the left, because Γ₀(N) ≤ SL₂(ℤ) and Δ₀(N) is a
submonoid containing both Γ₀(N) and α. The content is the other inclusion: an element
σ₁ α σ₂ of the level-one double coset that happens to lie in Δ₀(N) can be rewritten with
σ₁, σ₂ taken from Γ₀(N).
The mechanism is the Chinese-remainder decomposition
CongruenceSubgroup.Gamma_gcd_eq_sup: coprimality of det α with N makes
Γ(N) ⊔ Γ(det α) = ⊤, so σ₁ factors as τ_N · τ_a with τ_N ∈ Γ(N) ≤ Γ₀(N) and
τ_a ∈ Γ(det α). The second factor is absorbed on the other side: HeckeRing.GLn's
inv_conjugate_mem_SLnZ_of_mem_ker says α⁻¹ τ_a α is again integral, so
τ_a α = α · (α⁻¹ τ_a α), and the new right factor is forced into Γ₀(N) by reading off the
lower-left entry of the product —
which is where gcd(det α, N) = 1 is used a second time, through the lower-right entry.
Ported from the AINTLIB LeanModularForms project
(LeanModularForms/HeckeRIngs/GLn/CongruenceHecke/Foundation.lean, Chris Birkbeck,
https://github.com/CBirkbeck/AINTLIB/tree/main/projects/LeanModularForms).
Main results #
HeckeRing.GL2.Gamma0_map_le_SLnZ:Γ₀(N) ≤ SL₂(ℤ)insideGL₂(ℚ).HeckeRing.GL2.doubleCoset_Gamma0_map_le_doubleCoset_SLnZ:Γ₀(N) α Γ₀(N) ⊆ Γ α Γ.HeckeRing.GL2.gcd_apply_one_one_eq_one: for an integral matrix withN ∣ cand determinant coprime toN, the lower-right entry is coprime toN.HeckeRing.GL2.doubleCoset_SLnZ_inter_Delta0_eq_doubleCoset_Gamma0_map: the equality above.
References #
Γ₀(N) ≤ SL₂(ℤ) as subgroups of GL₂(ℚ): the image of any integral matrix of determinant
one lies in the range of mapGL.
Stated at the unfolded (Gamma0 N).map (mapGL ℚ) so the coset layer can use it directly: the
HeckeCoset types of CosetMap.lean are spelled that way, and transporting a folded
containment along Gamma0Image_def at each use site would hide the canonical form.
Γ₀(N) α Γ₀(N) ⊆ Γ α Γ: immediate from Γ₀(N) ≤ SL₂(ℤ).
Shimura, Lemma 3.29(3). For α ∈ Δ₀(N) with gcd(det α, N) = 1, cutting the level-one
double coset down to Δ₀(N) leaves exactly the Γ₀(N)-double coset:
SL₂(ℤ) α SL₂(ℤ) ∩ Δ₀(N) = Γ₀(N) α Γ₀(N).
This is the prerequisite for comparing the level-one and Γ₀(N) Hecke operators at an index
coprime to the level, and so for the later multiplicativity of T_n on M_k(Γ₀(N)); neither
comparison nor multiplicativity is proved here — this identifies the two double cosets.