Compatibility of local-field structures in towers #
For a tower M/L/K, where K and L are nonarchimedean local fields and M/K is algebraic,
the valuative relation and topology constructed on M do not depend on whether the construction
starts from K or from L. Thus constructions on algebraic subextensions can be compared without
postulating compatible structures on the top field.
The norms themselves are not asserted equal: the normalized absolute values on K and L
can have different normalizations. Uniqueness of the extended valuative relation identifies
their orders, and hence their topologies.
Main results #
TauCeti.algebraicExtensionValuativeRel_tower: equality of the constructed valuative relations.TauCeti.algebraicExtensionNormedFieldTopology_tower: equality of the constructed topologies.TauCeti.algebraicExtension_valuativeExtension_tower: the construction overKalso extends the valuative relation onL.
References #
- J. Neukirch, Algebraic Number Theory, Chapter II, ยง4 (uniqueness of extended valuations).
Extending the valuative relation through an intermediate local field agrees with
extending it directly from the base field. No valuative relation on M is assumed.
The spectral-norm topology on an algebraic extension is unchanged when constructed through
an intermediate local field. No topology on M is assumed.
With the valuative relation constructed directly over K, the top field of an algebraic
tower is a valuative extension of the intermediate field as well.