Documentation

TauCeti.NumberTheory.LocalField.MassFormula.Finite

Finiteness of the totally ramified extensions of given degree #

Let K be a nonarchimedean local field with residue field of cardinality q, and let 0 < n. Serre's mass formula ∑_{L ∈ σ_K(n)} q ^ (-c(L)) = n decides whether the family σ_K(n) = totallyRamifiedOfDegree K n is finite. Outside the case where K has characteristic p > 0 and p ∣ n, that is when (n : K) ≠ 0, the wild exponents of the members of σ_K(n) are bounded: by the upper bound of Dedekind's different theorem, d(L) ≤ n - 1 + v_L(n), and v_L(n) = n · v_K(n) since L / K is totally ramified of degree n, so c(L) ≤ n · v_K(n). Every weight q ^ (-c(L)) is then at least q ^ (-n · v_K(n)), and the weighted sum is finite exactly when σ_K(n) is finite. In the tame case, when the residue characteristic does not divide n, every weight is 1 and the weighted sum is the cardinality of σ_K(n).

Together with the converse half, that σ_K(n) is infinite when (n : K) = 0 (TauCeti.infinite_totallyRamifiedOfDegree), this says that σ_K(n) is infinite exactly when K has equal characteristic p with p ∣ n or the weighted sum is infinite. The mass formula, which makes the weighted sum n, then gives Serre's finiteness dichotomy; it also gives the tame count #σ_K(n) = n.

Main results #

References #

The discriminant bound for σ_K(n) away from equal characteristic p ∣ n: if n is nonzero in K, the discriminant exponent of L ∈ σ_K(n) is at most n - 1 + n · v_K(n). Since L / K is totally ramified, d(L) is the different exponent, so this is differentExponent_le_ramificationIndex_sub_one_add_natCastValuation with e(L / K) = n, together with v_L(n) = n · v_K(n).

The wild exponent is bounded on σ_K(n) away from equal characteristic p ∣ n: if n is nonzero in K, every L ∈ σ_K(n) has c(L) ≤ n · v_K(n). In equal characteristic, where v_K(n) = 0, this recovers c(L) = 0 for p ∤ n.

Finiteness of σ_K(n) away from equal characteristic p ∣ n: if n is nonzero in K, the weighted count ∑_{L ∈ σ_K(n)} q ^ (-c(L)) of Serre's mass formula is finite exactly when σ_K(n) is finite. With the mass formula, this makes σ_K(n) finite.

The tame count, weighted form: if the residue characteristic of K does not divide n, every member of σ_K(n) has weight q ^ (-c(L)) = 1, so the weighted count ∑_{L ∈ σ_K(n)} q ^ (-c(L)) of Serre's mass formula is the cardinality of σ_K(n). With the mass formula, σ_K(n) has exactly n elements.

Serre's finiteness dichotomy, relative to the weighted count: for 0 < n, σ_K(n) is infinite exactly when K has equal characteristic p, the residue characteristic, with p ∣ n, or the weighted count ∑_{L ∈ σ_K(n)} q ^ (-c(L)) of Serre's mass formula is infinite. Since the mass formula makes that count n, the second alternative never occurs.