The units of an unramified extension have no Tate cohomology #
Let L/K be a finite unramified Galois extension of nonarchimedean local fields, with Galois
group G. This file proves that the unit group 𝒪[L]ˣ = U(L, 0), with its Galois action and
read as an integral representation of G, has vanishing Tate cohomology in every degree.
In degree zero, H-hat^0(G, 𝒪[L]ˣ) = 𝒪[K]ˣ / N_{L/K}(𝒪[L]ˣ) vanishes because the norm of
an unramified extension maps 𝒪[L]ˣ onto 𝒪[K]ˣ (TauCeti.map_normUnits_unitFiltration). The
group G is cyclic (TauCeti.isCyclic_algEquiv) and the Herbrand quotient of 𝒪[L]ˣ is 1
(TauCeti.TateCohomology.herbrandQuotient_unitFiltration_zero), so H-hat^(-1)(G, 𝒪[L]ˣ)
vanishes as well, and two-periodicity gives every other degree.
The statement concerns the whole group G. Since L/E is again unramified for every intermediate
field E, the same theorem over E applies to the subgroup Gal(L/E) of G.
This is the local factor at the places outside S in the computation of the Herbrand quotient
of the S-ideles of a cyclic extension of number fields: the unit groups at places unramified
in L contribute nothing to the Tate cohomology of the ideles.
⚠ For ramified extensions only the Herbrand quotient survives: for L = ℚ_2(√2) the norms of the
units of 𝒪[L] have index 2 in ℤ_2ˣ, so H-hat^0(G, 𝒪[L]ˣ) has order 2.
Main results #
TauCeti.TateCohomology.isZero_tateCohomology_unitFiltration_zero_of_isUnramified:H-hat^n(G, 𝒪[L]ˣ) = 0for everyn : ℤ, for an unramified Galois extensionL/K.
References #
- J.-P. Serre, Local Fields, Chapter V, §2, Proposition 3 and Chapter VIII, §1.
- J. S. Milne, Class Field Theory, Chapter III, Proposition 1.2 and Chapter VII, Lemma 2.4.
The units of an unramified extension have no Tate cohomology. For a finite unramified
Galois extension L/K of nonarchimedean local fields, the unit group 𝒪[L]ˣ has vanishing Tate
cohomology H-hat^n(Gal(L/K), 𝒪[L]ˣ) in every degree n : ℤ.