Documentation

TauCeti.NumberTheory.ModularForms.LevelOne.TraceFormula.Acyclicity

Acyclicity of the permutation module of ℳₙ #

For n ≠ 0, the left action of PSL(2, ℤ) on the projective determinant-n matrix module ℳₙ is free (TauCeti.TraceFormulaMatrixModule.isCancelSMul). Hence the acyclicity of permutation modules of free PSL(2, ℤ)-sets (TauCeti.ModularGroup.disjoint_ker_one_add_S_ker_one_add_T_mul_S_add_sq) applies to k[ℳₙ]: no nonzero element is killed by both 1 + S and 1 + U + U², where U = T * S. Popa and Zagier state this (their Lemma 2) for ℚ[ℳ], with ℳ the integral matrices of positive determinant modulo sign; its summands ℛₙ = ℚ[ℳₙ] are the case needed for the trace formula. The right action of PSL(2, ℤ) on ℳₙ is free as well (TauCeti.TraceFormulaMatrixModule.isCancelSMul_mulOpposite), so the same holds for S and U acting on k[ℳₙ] by right multiplication.

The hypothesis n ≠ 0 is needed. On ℳ₀ the left action is not free (T fixes the class of (1 0; 0 0)), and acyclicity for the left action fails for a nontrivial ring k: S swaps the classes of (1 0; 0 0) and (0 0; 1 0), and U permutes them cyclically with the class of (1 0; 1 0), so [(0 0; 1 0)] - [(1 0; 0 0)] is a nonzero element of both kernels on k[ℳ₀].

Main results #

References #

Acyclicity of k[ℳₙ] (Popa--Zagier, Lemma 2): for n ≠ 0, on the permutation module k[ℳₙ] of the left action of SL(2, ℤ), the kernels of 1 + S and 1 + U + U², with U = T * S, are disjoint.

Acyclicity of k[ℳₙ] for the right action (Popa--Zagier, Lemma 2): for n ≠ 0, on the permutation module k[ℳₙ] of the right action of PSL(2, ℤ), the kernels of 1 + S and 1 + U + U², with S and U = T * S acting by right multiplication, are disjoint.

The Choie–Zagier criterion on k[ℳₙ] (Popa–Zagier, §3, Lemma 1): for n ≠ 0 and 2, 3 invertible in k, an element x ∈ k[ℳₙ] lies in (1 + S) k[ℳₙ] + (1 + U + U²) k[ℳₙ], with U = T * S, if and only if (1 - S) x ∈ (1 - T) k[ℳₙ], all products being left multiplications.