The Hecke eigenvalue of the Eisenstein period polynomial #
Let w be even and n ≠ 0. Every solution ξ of Popa–Zagier's period relation (A) in
ℛₙ = R[ℳₙ] acts on the Eisenstein period polynomial X^w - Y^w by the scalar σ_{w+1}(|n|):
(X^w - Y^w) ∣ ξ = σ_{w+1}(|n|) (X^w - Y^w)
(TauCeti.TraceFormulaMatrixModule.PeriodRelation.periodAction_eisensteinPeriodPolynomial). For
n > 0 and positive even w, this is the eigenvalue of the Hecke operator Tₙ on the Eisenstein
series E_{w+2}, whose extended even period polynomial is a multiple of X^w - Y^w: the
solutions of (A) act on period polynomials as Tₙ on the Eisenstein part, as they do on the
period polynomials of cusp forms
(TauCeti.TraceFormulaMatrixModule.PeriodRelation.periodAction_periodPolynomial). This is the
Eisenstein contribution σ_{k-1}(n) to the trace of Tₙ on the period-polynomial space, in
weight k = w + 2 ≥ 4. At w = 0 the polynomial X^0 - Y^0 is zero and E₂ is not a level-one
modular form, so the identity holds trivially and has no such interpretation.
The proof is algebraic. The binary form attached to the functional P ↦ P(1, 0) - P(0, 1) is
Y^w - X^w, and this functional is the evaluation of the modular symbols {∞, 0} ⊗ P at the
cusps (TauCeti.ModularSymbols.boundaryEval). By Popa–Zagier's Proposition 2 on modular symbols
(TauCeti.TraceFormulaMatrixModule.PeriodRelation.symbolAction_eq), the action of ξ on it is
the evaluation of ∑ {a∞, a0} ⊗ (P ∣ adj a) at the cusps, the sum over the upper-triangular
representatives a = (a b; 0 d) of Γ \ ℳₙ. The values at a∞ = ∞ are
P(adj a (1, 0)) = P(d, 0) = dʷ P(1, 0), and there are |d| representatives for each factor
pair (a, d), so they sum to σ_{w+1}(|n|) P(1, 0)
(TauCeti.TraceFormulaMatrixModule.boundaryEval_comp_upperTriangularSymbol). The values at
a0 = (aS)∞ are the values at ∞ along the representatives aS. The functional
M ↦ (P ∣ adj M)(v_{M∞}) is invariant under left multiplication by SL(2, ℤ), and Tₙ^∞ S is the
formal sum of another set of representatives of Γ \ ℳₙ, so these sum to
σ_{w+1}(|n|) (P ∣ S)(1, 0) = σ_{w+1}(|n|) P(0, 1). No count of the cusps b/d is needed.
Main results #
TauCeti.binaryFormDual_evalCusp_infty_sub_evalCusp_zero: the binary form attached toP ↦ P(1, 0) - P(0, 1)is-(X^w - Y^w), for evenw.TauCeti.TraceFormulaMatrixModule.boundaryEval_comp_upperTriangularSymbol: the evaluation at the cusps of∑ {a∞, a0} ⊗ (P ∣ adj a)isσ_{w+1}(|n|) (P(1, 0) - P(0, 1)).TauCeti.TraceFormulaMatrixModule.PeriodRelation.periodAction_eisensteinPeriodPolynomial: every solution of the period relation acts onX^w - Y^wbyσ_{w+1}(|n|).
References #
- A. Popa and D. Zagier, An elementary proof of the Eichler–Selberg trace formula, J. Reine Angew. Math. 762 (2020), 105–122, arXiv:1711.00327, §§1–2.
- W. Kohnen and D. Zagier, Modular forms with rational periods, in Modular Forms (R. A. Rankin, ed.), Ellis Horwood, 1984, 197–249, §1.
The binary form of the evaluation at ∞ and 0 #
The Eisenstein polynomial is the binary form of the evaluation at ∞ and 0. For even
w, the binary form attached to P ↦ P(1, 0) - P(0, 1) is Y^w - X^w.
The values at the cusps a∞ #
The values at the cusps a0 #
The Hecke eigenvalue #
The evaluation at the cusps of the Hecke sum over ℳₙ^∞. For n ≠ 0 and even w, the
evaluation at the cusps of ∑ {∞, b/d} ⊗ (P ∣ adj (a b; 0 d)), the sum over the upper-triangular
representatives of Γ \ ℳₙ, is σ_{w+1}(|n|) (P(1, 0) - P(0, 1)).
The Hecke eigenvalue of the Eisenstein period polynomial. For n ≠ 0 and even w, every
solution ξ of Popa–Zagier's period relation (A) acts on the Eisenstein polynomial X^w - Y^w
by σ_{w+1}(|n|): (X^w - Y^w) ∣ ξ = σ_{w+1}(|n|) (X^w - Y^w).