Documentation

TauCeti.NumberTheory.ModularForms.LevelOne.TraceFormula.ExplicitElement.CosetSum

The right coset sums of Popa–Zagier's explicit element #

For ξ = ∑ c_M M ∈ k[ℳₙ] and a right coset K = M Γ of Γ = PSL(2, ℤ) in ℳₙ, write ⟨ξ, K⟩ = ∑_{M ∈ K} c_M. Popa and Zagier's explicit Hecke element Tₙ (written with a tilde in their paper, their eq. (15)) has ⟨Tₙ, K⟩ = -1 for every right coset K and every n > 0 (their Theorem 4(b), first part). Together with the exchange relations (B), this coset identity is the input from which they deduce that Tₙ satisfies the period relation (A).

The proof reduces to a single coset in each double coset. Since Tₙ satisfies (B), its coset sums are constant on double cosets (Popa–Zagier, Theorem 2(a)), and every double coset contains a coset diag(d₀, d₁) Γ with 0 < d₀ ∣ d₁. On such a coset, write Tₙ = T₁ - T₂ - T₃ - T₄ as in eq. (15).

Main results #

References #

The sums T₃ and T₄ on the coset of diag(1, m) #

The coset sum of the weight #

Popa–Zagier, Theorem 4(b), the coset identity: for n > 0, the coefficients of Popa–Zagier's explicit element Tₙ sum to -1 over every right coset K of PSL(2, ℤ) in ℳₙ, that is, ⟨Tₙ, K⟩ = -1. This needs 12 ≠ 0 in k, as Tₙ is defined with denominators dividing 12.