Stability of the new subspace under the bad-prime operators #
For a prime p dividing the level N, the operator U_p = T_p maps the new subspace
S_k(Γ₁(N))ⁿᵉʷ into itself. With the good primes, the new subspace is stable under T_p at
every prime. Together with its stability under the diamond operators, and that of the old
subspace under every T_p and every diamond operator, this is Diamond–Shurman's
Proposition 5.6.2: both subspaces are stable under the whole Hecke algebra.
At a good prime the stability of the new subspace comes from that of the old subspace, since the
Petersson adjoint of T_p is ⟨p⟩⁻¹ T_p. At p ∣ N that argument is not available: the
adjoint of U_p is not a multiple of U_p, and the stability of the old subspace only gives the
stability of the new subspace under the adjoint. Instead, the newforms span the new subspace
(HeckeRing.GL2.Newform.span_range_toCuspForm_eq_cuspFormsNew), and each of them is a
U_p-eigenvector (HeckeRing.GL2.Newform.heckeUCuspNat_eq_qExpansion_coeff_smul, proved without
any bad-prime stability), so U_p carries a spanning family of the new subspace into it.
On a character space S_k(N, χ), where the Hecke ring of Γ₀(N) acts, the new part is then
stable under every prime generator, hence under every T_n
(HeckeRing.GL2.heckeRingHomCuspCharSpace_heckeTCompositeGamma0_mem_of_forall_prime_dvd).
Main results #
TauCeti.heckeTCuspNat_mem_cuspFormsNew:T_pmaps the new subspace into itself, for every primep, withTauCeti.cuspFormsNew_map_heckeTCuspNat_leitsSubmodule.mapform.TauCeti.heckeUCuspNat_mem_cuspFormsNew: its specialization toU_p, for a primep ∣ N, withTauCeti.cuspFormsNew_map_heckeUCuspNat_leitsSubmodule.mapform.TauCeti.coe_heckeRingHomCuspCharSpace_heckeTCompositeGamma0_mem_cuspFormsNew: the new part ofS_k(N, χ)is stable under everyT_n, withTauCeti.cuspFormsNew_comap_map_heckeRingHomCuspCharSpace_heckeTCompositeGamma0_leitsSubmodule.mapform.
References #
- F. Diamond and J. Shurman, A first course in modular forms, Proposition 5.6.2.
- T. Miyake, Modular forms, Theorem 4.6.13.
The new subspace is stable under every T_p: for every prime p, whether or not it
divides the level, T_p maps S_k(Γ₁(N))ⁿᵉʷ into itself. This is the new-space half of
Diamond–Shurman's Proposition 5.6.2 for the operators T_p. At a good prime it is
heckeTCuspNat_mem_cuspFormsNew_of_coprime; at p ∣ N the newforms span the new subspace and
T_p = U_p scales each of them.
The new subspace is stable under every T_p, in the Submodule.map form.
The new subspace is stable under the bad-prime operator U_p: for a prime p dividing
the level, U_p = T_p maps S_k(Γ₁(N))ⁿᵉʷ into itself. This is the specialization of
heckeTCuspNat_mem_cuspFormsNew to the primes dividing the level.
The new subspace is stable under U_p for p ∣ N, in the Submodule.map form.
The new part of S_k(N, χ) is stable under every Hecke operator T_n, the composite
element heckeTCompositeGamma0 N n of the Γ₀(N) Hecke ring acting on S_k(N, χ), whether or
not n shares a factor with the level. This is the new-space half of Diamond–Shurman's
Proposition 5.6.2 for the operators T_n; the old-space half is
coe_heckeRingHomCuspCharSpace_heckeTCompositeGamma0_mem_cuspFormsOld.
The new part of S_k(N, χ) is stable under every T_n, in Submodule.map form.