Documentation

TauCeti.NumberTheory.RamificationInertia.Tower

Ramification indices in finite flat towers #

This file records consequences of the fundamental identity for ramification and inertia in a finite flat extension of domains. The number of primes above a prime and each prime's contribution are at most the rank of the extension. Ramification also cancels in a tower when the absolute ramification index at the top equals the absolute ramification index at the intermediate prime: multiplicativity then forces the relative ramification index to be one.

The cancellation result is the local step used in the finite-place half of the genus-field construction. At a rational prime dividing a prime discriminant, both the quadratic base and the prime-discriminant compositum have absolute ramification index two; cancellation then shows that the compositum is unramified over the quadratic base.

Main results #

There are at most Module.finrank R S primes above a prime. Every ramification index and inertia degree in the fundamental identity is positive, so every prime above p contributes at least one to the rank.

One prime's contribution to the fundamental identity is at most the extension rank. For a prime q of S above a prime p of R, the product of its ramification index and inertia degree is at most Module.finrank R S.

A ramification index is at most the rank of a finite flat extension. For a prime q of S above a prime p of R, e(q / p) ≤ Module.finrank R S.

Ramification-index cancellation in a tower. Let r be a prime of T above a prime q of S. If their absolute ramification indices over R agree, then the relative ramification index e(r / q) is one. Indeed, multiplicativity gives e(r / R) = e(q / R) * e(r / S), and e(q / R) is positive in a finite extension.

Absolute ramification-index equality implies relative unramifiedness. Let q be a prime of S. If every prime r of T above q has the same absolute ramification index over R as q, then q is unramified in T. This is the all-primes form of ramificationIdx_eq_one_of_eq_ramificationIdx.

No increase in absolute ramification implies relative unramifiedness. Let q be a prime of S. If every prime r of T above q has absolute ramification index at most that of q, then q is unramified in T. The reverse inequality is automatic from multiplicativity in the tower, so the absolute indices are equal and isUnramifiedIn_of_forall_eq_ramificationIdx applies.

A transverse unramified subextension cancels the base ramification. Suppose T is also an extension of a domain U over R. Let q be a prime of S, assume Module.finrank U T ≤ e(q / R), and assume that for every prime r above q, its contraction to U has absolute ramification index one. Then q is unramified in T.

Indeed, the tower through U identifies e(r / R) with e(r / U), which is at most Module.finrank U T; hence e(r / R) ≤ e(q / R), and isUnramifiedIn_of_forall_ramificationIdx_le applies. For a biquadratic compositum at a shared ramified prime, S / R has ramification index two while T / U has degree two.

Unramifiedness descends to a subring. If an ideal I of the base A is unramified in S, then every prime of an intermediate ring R lying over I is unramified over A. The direction is descent, not ascent: the hypothesis is upstairs and the conclusion downstairs.

A and I are arbitrary; the hypotheses that carry the argument are the ambient ones on R and S. Its number-field instance is NumberField.isUnramifiedAway_of_intermediateField, which quantifies it over the places outside a finite set.