Basic implications from mixed i.i.d.-ness #
This file records the first implication out of the Layer 0 mixed-i.i.d. API:
mixed i.i.d. processes are exchangeable. The definition
MixedIIDWith μ X ν already states that every injective finite coordinate selection
has the same product-mixture law, so the exchangeability proof is just the specialization to
the permuted and identity selections of Fin n.
The resulting exchangeability theorem is one of the Layer 0 bridges listed in
TauCetiRoadmap/Exchangeability/Suggested.lean; the contractability corollaries use the same
injective-block identity, since strictly increasing finite selections are injective.
These declarations follow the cameronfreer/exchangeability Layer 0 implication lattice
pinned at e0532e59ceff23edab44dda9ab0655debbc9cc22, but use Tau Ceti's current
MixedIIDWith API, where the finite-block mixture identity is already stated for
arbitrary injective selections.
Under a named mixing representative, the prefix law has the common finite-product mixture law.
Under a named mixing representative, every injective finite block has the same law as the corresponding prefix.
A mixed i.i.d. process has the same law along every injective finite block as along the corresponding prefix.
A named mixing representative makes the law of each finite prefix invariant under permutations of that prefix.
A process with a named mixing representative is exchangeable.
A mixed i.i.d. process is exchangeable. This is the Layer 0 bridge from the mixed-i.i.d.
API to finite exchangeability (the roadmap's exchangeable_of_mixedIID).
A process with a named mixing representative is contractable: strictly increasing finite selections are injective finite selections.
A mixed i.i.d. process is contractable: strictly increasing finite selections are injective finite selections.