Documentation

TauCeti.RepresentationTheory.CharacterTable.FrobeniusSchur.Realizability

Frobenius-Schur indicator 1 means realizable over the reals #

TauCeti/RepresentationTheory/CharacterTable/FrobeniusSchur/RealForm.lean proves that an irreducible complex representation with a real form has Frobenius-Schur indicator 1. This file proves the converse, completing the orthogonality criterion: an irreducible representation of a finite group with ν₂(ρ) = 1 is realizable over ℝ.

The indicator only supplies a nondegenerate invariant symmetric bilinear form B (TauCeti.Representation.frobeniusSchurIndicator_eq_one_iff), and that is strictly weaker than a real form. The missing ingredient is a positive definite invariant Hermitian form H (Representation.exists_isInvariantSesqForm_isPosSemidef_apply_self_ne_zero), which is where finiteness of the group is used; comparing the two forms then produces a real structure (Representation.exists_isRealStructure_of_isInvariantForm_of_isInvariantSesqForm, in TauCeti/RepresentationTheory/InvariantForm/StructureMap.lean), whose real points are a real form. All that is left here is to assemble the three steps, and to record the criterion in its ↔ form.

Main results #

References #

The converse, that an irreducible representation realizable over ℝ has indicator 1, is in TauCeti/RepresentationTheory/CharacterTable/FrobeniusSchur/RealForm.lean.

The Frobenius-Schur criterion #

An irreducible representation of a finite group with Frobenius-Schur indicator 1 is realizable over ℝ. The indicator supplies a nondegenerate invariant symmetric form, finiteness of the group supplies a positive definite invariant Hermitian form, and comparing the two produces a real structure, whose real points are a real form.

The orthogonality criterion in its realizability form: an irreducible complex representation of a finite group has Frobenius-Schur indicator 1 exactly when it is realizable over ℝ. The two halves are genuinely different theorems: one direction only transports an invariant symmetric form along a real form, while the other has to build the real structure out of an invariant symmetric form and an invariant Hermitian one.