The augmentation ideal and the augmentation sequence #
For a group G and a commutative ring k, the augmentation k[G] ⟶ k sends a group ring
element to the sum of its coefficients, and its kernel I_G is the augmentation ideal, here
taken as a representation of G. The augmentation sequence 0 ⟶ I_G ⟶ k[G] ⟶ k ⟶ 0 is short
exact, and stays short exact after restriction along any monoid homomorphism.
Nothing here mentions cohomology: the cohomological consequences live in
TauCeti.RepresentationTheory.Homological.TateCohomology.Augmentation, which imports this file.
Main definitions #
Rep.augmentation: the augmentationk[G] ⟶ k.Rep.augmentationIdeal: the augmentation idealI_G, the kernel of the augmentation.Rep.augmentationSES: the short exact sequenceI_G ⟶ k[G] ⟶ k.Rep.augmentationιIsKernel: the augmentation ideal is a kernel of the augmentation.Rep.augmentationKerIso: the module-theoretic kernel of the group-ring augmentation is the categorical augmentation ideal.
Main statements #
Rep.augmentationSES_shortExact,Rep.augmentationSES_res_shortExact: the augmentation sequence is short exact, also after restriction along a monoid homomorphism.TauCeti.AugmentationIdeal.singleSub,TauCeti.AugmentationIdeal.ι_singleSub: an element mapping to[g] a - [1] aand its image under the inclusion.TauCeti.AugmentationIdeal.ρ_singleSub,TauCeti.AugmentationIdeal.singleSub_one: the group action and value at the identity.TauCeti.AugmentationIdeal.sum_coeff_augmentationι: the coefficients of an augmentation-ideal element sum to zero.
References #
- J. S. Milne, Class Field Theory, Chapter II, proof of Theorem 3.11.
- J. Neukirch, A. Schmidt, K. Wingberg, Cohomology of Number Fields, (3.1.4).
- The same construction appears in
ClassFieldTheory/Cohomology/AugmentationModule.leaninkbuzzard/ClassFieldTheory, commitccc3323c6750abca25b49b35106f54eb3a398509(Apache-2.0); it is reimplemented here on Mathlib'sRepAPI rather than copied.
The augmentation k[G] ⟶ k, the map of representations sending a group ring element to
the sum of its coefficients; it is the map out of the left regular representation attached to
1 : k.
Instances For
The augmentation of representations is the coefficient sum
TauCeti.MonoidAlgebra.augmentation.
The augmentation is surjective.
The augmentation ideal I_G, the kernel of the augmentation k[G] ⟶ k, as a
representation of G. The body is exposed because the endpoints of the connecting homomorphism
built from augmentationSES appear in downstream statement types.
Instances For
The inclusion of the augmentation ideal into the left regular representation.
Instances For
The inclusion of the augmentation ideal is a monomorphism.
The inclusion of the augmentation ideal followed by the augmentation is zero.
The inclusion of the augmentation ideal is a kernel of the augmentation.
Instances For
The augmentation sequence I_G ⟶ k[G] ⟶ k. The body is exposed for the same reason as
augmentationIdeal: downstream statements name the endpoints of its connecting homomorphism.
Instances For
The augmentation sequence has maps the inclusion of the augmentation ideal and the augmentation.
The first term of the augmentation sequence is the augmentation ideal.
The middle term of the augmentation sequence is the left regular representation.
The last term of the augmentation sequence is the trivial representation on k.
The augmentation sequence is short exact.
The augmentation sequence stays short exact after restriction along any monoid homomorphism
f : H →* G.
The representation attached to the module-theoretic augmentation kernel of k[G] is the
categorical augmentation ideal Rep.augmentationIdeal k G.
Instances For
The augmentation-kernel isomorphism is compatible with the inclusions into the group ring.
The element of the augmentation ideal whose image in k[G] is [g] a - [1] a.
Instances For
The image of singleSub a g under the inclusion into k[G].
The inclusion of the augmentation ideal into k[G] is injective.
The coefficients of an element of the augmentation ideal sum to zero after inclusion in the group ring.