Cohomological dimension and subgroups with injective restriction #
Let G be a topological group and H a subgroup. If restriction Hⁱ⁺¹(G, M) → Hⁱ⁺¹(H, M) is
injective for every discrete p-primary torsion G-module M and every i, then vanishing of
cohomology transfers from H to G: CohomologicalDimensionLE p H n implies
CohomologicalDimensionLE p G n, and consequently cd_p G ≤ cd_p H. No topological hypothesis on
G or H is needed.
This is the common formal step behind the comparisons of cd_p G with the cohomological
dimension of a subgroup on which restriction is injective, such as an open subgroup of index
prime to p or a closed subgroup all of whose open neighbourhoods have index prime to p
(TauCeti.RepresentationTheory.Homological.ContCohomology.CohomologicalDimension.IndexNotDvd).
Main results #
TauCeti.CohomologicalDimensionLE.of_forall_res_injective: vanishing transfers along a subgroup on which restriction is injective in every positive degree.TauCeti.cohomologicalDimensionAt_le_of_forall_res_injective:cd_p G ≤ cd_p Hfor a subgroupHon which restriction is injective in every positive degree, for every discretep-primary torsionG-module.
References #
- J.-P. Serre, Galois Cohomology, Ch. I, §3.3.
- J. Neukirch, A. Schmidt, K. Wingberg, Cohomology of Number Fields, 2nd ed., Ch. III §3.
Vanishing transfers along a subgroup on which restriction is injective, as the vanishing
predicate: if restriction Hⁱ⁺¹(G, M) → Hⁱ⁺¹(H, M) is injective for every discrete p-primary
torsion G-module M and every i, then CohomologicalDimensionLE p H n implies
CohomologicalDimensionLE p G n.
cd_p G ≤ cd_p H for a subgroup H on which restriction is injective: if restriction
Hⁱ⁺¹(G, M) → Hⁱ⁺¹(H, M) is injective for every discrete p-primary torsion G-module M and
every i, then the p-cohomological dimension of G is at most that of H.